Wayne,
Please confirm that the explanation and action plan below is
acceptable. If not, what would be the PMC recommendation for the short
term?
Thank you,
Ricardo.
______________________________________________________
Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational
Method Architect Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
Inactive hide details for Bingxue Xu---09/17/2009 04:33:32 PM---Hi
Ricardo, We don't have any specific reason beside for the hiBingxue
Xu---09/17/2009 04:33:32 PM---Hi Ricardo, We don't have any specific
reason beside for the historic one: we had used 1.0.1.2 for D
From:
Bingxue Xu/Cupertino/IBM
To:
Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:
Bruce Macisaac/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, Technology PMC
<technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Bingxue Xu/Cupertino/IBM
Date:
09/17/2009 04:33 PM
Subject:
Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Ricardo,
We don't have any specific reason beside for the historic one: we had
used 1.0.1.2 for Dec. 13, 2006 release, and 1.2.0.x during 2007 & 2008
releases, and continued with 1.5.0.x
http://www.eclipse.org/epf/downloads/tool/tool_downloads.php
I suppose that we are not following the version numbering guidelines
closely enough (our fault), and I'd suggest to update and follow the
guidelines for the future releases.
Thanks.
Bing.
Inactive hide details for Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBMRicardo
Balduino/Cupertino/IBM
*Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM*
09/17/2009 02:37 PM
To
Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Bingxue
Xu/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
cc
Bruce Macisaac/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Subject
Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release ReviewBingxue Xu
<Notes://D03NM118/87256CCC00107E4D/38D46BF5E8F08834852564B500129B2C/CC0BFF5E5C2994B44FC83DA76FDDDAC3>
Bing,
Would you please help address Wayne's question below?
Thank you.
Ricardo.
______________________________________________________
Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational
Method Architect Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
Inactive hide details for Wayne Beaton ---09/17/2009 02:10:00 PM---The
version numbering guidelines [1] suggest three-segment vWayne Beaton
---09/17/2009 02:10:00 PM---The version numbering guidelines [1]
suggest three-segment version numbers (with a fourth "qualifie
From:
Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx, emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
09/17/2009 02:10 PM
Subject:
Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
Sent by:
technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The version numbering guidelines [1] suggest three-segment version
numbers (with a fourth "qualifier" segment).
Can you tell me why EPF is using four segments?
Wayne
Ricardo Balduino wrote:
>
> Yes, we are (from 1.5.0.3 to 1.5.0.4).
>
> Ricardo.
> ______________________________________________________
> Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
>
>
> Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational
> Method Architect Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: 09/17/2009 01:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
> Sent by: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> We are talking about a +0.0.1 version number increment, right?
>
> Wayne
>
> Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> >
> > Wayne,
> >
> > Thank you for the clarification. This is indeed a maintenance release
> > of EPF.
> >
> > Anne,
> >
> > Apologies that I got the car in front of the horses. Please cancel the
> > tentative time slot for the EPF review at this time.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ricardo.
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
> >
> >
> > Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational
> > Method Architect Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: 09/17/2009 12:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
> > Sent by: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Service releases (bug fix releases with no new features) do not
require
> > a review. Check out exception three in section 6.4 of the development
> > process:
> >
> >
>
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process.php#6_4_Releases
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> > >
> > > PMC,
> > >
> > > When gathering the information for this release, it occurred to us
> > > that maintenance releases may not required a release review.
> > > Is this a correct assumption?
> > >
> > > We are essentially delivering fixes on the 2 major components: EPF
> > > Composer tool and Process Library.
> > > Please refer to project plan for details, located at:
> > >
> >
>
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=technology.epf
> > >
> > > And please let us know at your earliest convenience if we should
> > > proceed with the Release Review, as we would need to prepare the
> > > project log and slides if affirmative.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much,
> > > Ricardo Balduino
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
> > >
> > >
> > > Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational
> > > Method Architect Rational Method Composer (RMC)
Team
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM
> > > To: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > > Date: 09/16/2009 11:18 AM
> > > Subject: EPF Release Review
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Technology PMC,
> > >
> > > The EPF project team is preparing to release a new version on
October
> > > 10 and we kindly request your approval to have a release review on
> > > October 7, as described by the EMO below.
> > >
> > > Please, do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions or
> comments.
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Ricardo Balduino.
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
> > > Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational
> > > Method Architect Rational Method Composer (RMC)
Team
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Forwarded by Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM on 09/16/2009
08:39
> > > AM -----
> > > From: Anne Jacko <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > > Cc: Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: 09/15/2009 06:07 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-committers] Eclipse
> > Project Reviews
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello Ricardo,
> > >
> > > We are planning to have reviews on Wednesday, Oct. 7, at 8am PDT. If
> > > everything is ready for your review by Sept. 30 (one week before the
> > > review date), you could have your review then.
> > >
> > > There are three things we need for the review: 1) PMC approval; 2)
> > > approved IP Log, and 3) docuware (slides).
> > >
> > > This page has a detailed description of the steps in the review
> > > process:
> > >
> >
>
_http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Review_Information_for_Project_Leads#Release_Reviews_
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have any questions after reading the wiki page and referenced
> > > documentation, just let me know. Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > Anne Jacko _
> > > __emo@eclipse.org_ <mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello Anne,
> > >
> > > When are the next Release Review meetings scheduled for (late
> > > September / early October)?
> > > We have an upcoming release of EPF, and would like to know when we
> > > should present the review.
> > > Are the deliverables for the review meeting the same as before (i.e.
> > > slide deck and project log)?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Ricardo Balduino.
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
> > > Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational
> > > Method Architect Rational Method Composer (RMC)
Team
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > technology-pmc mailing list
> > > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > technology-pmc mailing list
> > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> >
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > technology-pmc mailing list
> > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> >
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
