Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review

[Ricardo Balduino <balduino@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Bing,

Would you please help address Wayne's
question below?

Thank you.

Ricardo.
______________________________________________________

Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
Senior Software Engineer	IBM Rational
Method Architect	Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team

From:	Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx, emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	09/17/2009 02:10 PM
Subject:	Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
Sent by:	technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

The version numbering guidelines [1] suggest three-segment
version 
numbers (with a fourth "qualifier" segment).

Can you tell me why EPF is using four segments?

Wayne

Ricardo Balduino wrote:
>
> Yes, we are (from 1.5.0.3 to 1.5.0.4).
>
> Ricardo.
> ______________________________________________________
> Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
>
>                  
> Senior Software Engineer          
       IBM Rational
> Method Architect            
     Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
>
>
>
>
>
> From:                
 Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:                
 Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:                
 emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date:                
 09/17/2009 01:52 PM
> Subject:              
   Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
> Sent by:              
   technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> We are talking about a +0.0.1 version number increment, right?
>
> Wayne
>
> Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> >
> > Wayne,
> >
> > Thank you for the clarification. This is indeed a maintenance
release
> > of EPF.
> >
> > Anne,
> >
> > Apologies that I got the car in front of the horses. Please cancel
the
> > tentative time slot for the EPF review at this time.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ricardo.
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
> >
> >                  
> > Senior Software Engineer            
     IBM Rational
> > Method Architect              
   Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:                
 Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To:                  Technology
PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc:                  emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date:                
 09/17/2009 12:05 PM
> > Subject:                
 Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
> > Sent by:                
 technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Service releases (bug fix releases with no new features) do not
require
> > a review. Check out exception three in section 6.4 of the development
> > process:
> >
> > 
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process.php#6_4_Releases
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> > >
> > > PMC,
> > >
> > > When gathering the information for this release, it occurred
to us
> > > that maintenance releases may not required a release review.
> > > Is this a correct assumption?
> > >
> > > We are essentially delivering fixes on the 2 major components:
EPF
> > > Composer tool and Process Library.
> > > Please refer to project plan for details, located at:
> > >
> > 
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=technology.epf
> > >
> > > And please let us know at your earliest convenience if we
should
> > > proceed with the Release Review, as we would need to prepare
the
> > > project log and slides if affirmative.
> > >
> > > Thank you  very much,
> > > Ricardo Balduino
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
> > >
> > >                
 
> > > Senior Software Engineer          
       IBM Rational
> > > Method Architect            
     Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From:                
 Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM
> > > To:                
 technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc:                
 Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > > Date:                
 09/16/2009 11:18 AM
> > > Subject:              
   EPF Release Review
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Technology PMC,
> > >
> > > The EPF project team is preparing to release a new version
on October
> > > 10 and we kindly request your approval to have a release
review on
> > > October 7, as described by the EMO below.
> > >
> > > Please, do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions
or 
> comments.
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Ricardo Balduino.
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE          
       
> > > Senior Software Engineer          
       IBM Rational
> > > Method Architect            
     Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Forwarded by Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM on 09/16/2009
08:39
> > > AM -----
> > > From:                
 Anne Jacko <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To:                
 Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > > Cc:                
 Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date:                
 09/15/2009 06:07 PM
> > > Subject:              
   Re: [eclipse.org-committers] Eclipse
> > Project Reviews
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello Ricardo,
> > >
> > > We are planning to have reviews on Wednesday, Oct. 7, at
8am PDT. If
> > > everything is ready for your review by Sept. 30 (one week
before the
> > > review date), you could have your review then.
> > >
> > > There are three things we need for the review: 1) PMC approval;
2)
> > > approved IP Log, and 3) docuware (slides).
> > >
> > > This page has a detailed description of the steps in the
review
> > > process:
> > >
> > 
> _http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Review_Information_for_Project_Leads#Release_Reviews_
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have any questions after reading the wiki page and
referenced
> > > documentation, just let me know. Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > Anne Jacko _
> > > __emo@eclipse.org_ <mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello Anne,
> > >
> > > When are the next Release Review meetings scheduled for
(late
> > > September / early October)?
> > > We have an upcoming release of EPF, and would like to know
when we
> > > should present the review.
> > > Are the deliverables for the review meeting the same as
before (i.e.
> > > slide deck and project log)?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Ricardo Balduino.
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE          
       
> > > Senior Software Engineer          
       IBM Rational
> > > Method Architect            
     Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > technology-pmc mailing list
> > > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> > >  
> > _______________________________________________
> > technology-pmc mailing list
> > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > technology-pmc mailing list
> > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> >  
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>   
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc