[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for anithra
|
Based on the nomination text, I managed to find the bugzilla entry
containing the contribution and took a look through it. All of the .java
file in the contribution have three names in the headers. Other than a
file path in the DMRequest.java (which somebody should probably look at
btw), there is no evidence that Anithra did any work on it (though, this
is pretty compelling evidence that he did work on it).
I took a quick flip through the SVN repository on SourceForge. There is
evidence that Anithra moved the already-existing code into the
repository, but I haven't come across any evidence of ongoing development.
There is very little record in bugzilla to support the nomination. I've
only found one entry in the mailing list from Anithra announcing the
contribution.
I am concerned that, without some public record detailing the value
brought by the new committer it is difficult for other prospective
committers to understand where the bar is set. What does somebody need
to do to be worthy of joining the project?
Now... I do get a warm and fuzzy feeling that Anithra will be a valuable
committer. The vote has been approved.
In the future, as part of these elections, please provide more explicit
justification for the election. Explicitly list the bug number.
Explicitly state that he was a major contributor.
Thanks,
Wayne
portal on behalf of emo wrote:
technology PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for
anithra's Committer status on the technology.linux-distros project. As a
PMC member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My
Foundation portal page:
http://portal.eclipse.org/
anithra was nominated by Andrew Overholt as follows:
Anithra and his team at IBM have been working on the SystemTapGUI project
for a while now. They have contributed it to our project and it only makes
sense that Anithra become a committer to continue work at eclipse.org. We
will obviously expand to other members of the team when they contribute
patches, etc.
Thanks,
Andrew
Vote summary: 6/0/0 with 2 not voting
+1 Elliott Baron
? Nick Boldt
+1 Jeff Johnston
+1 Alexander Kurtakov
+1 Phil Muldoon
+1 Andrew Overholt
+1 Kent Sebastian
? Alphonse Van Assche
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc