Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

So is that +1 ?

Wayne

Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote:
> Is that a rhetorical question?
>
> <sarcasm>
> As a professional Eclipse developer and project lead for a Technology 
> project one of things that keeps me motivated (let's say all charged 
> up) is reading through the CQs to admire all of the hard work my 
> colleagues are engaged in. On a scale of 1 to 10 (with 10 being 
> nirvana) I rate reading CQs at 12.5
> </sarcasm>
>
> Sorry Wayne, I just could not resist :-)
>
> Joel
>
>
> On 24 Oct 2008, at 19:06, Wayne Beaton wrote:
>
> > How do we feel about all the CQ traffic?
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > David Whiteman wrote:
> > > Gunnar wrote on 10/24/2008 01:50:37 AM:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Wayne Beaton schrieb:
> > > >
> > > > > I'd like to propose that we split the list.
> > > > -1.
> > > >
> > > > IMHO it's totally unnecessary. It's a trivial task these days to setup
> > > > filters in an regular email client. We should instead use tags in the
> > > > subject to identify mails related to a project. For example, we can
> > > > prefix project specific messages with "[<projectshortname>]".
> > > >
> > > > -Gunnar
> > >
> > > FWIW, +1 to Gunnar's comment
> > >  ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > technology-pmc mailing list
> > > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> > _______________________________________________
> > technology-pmc mailing list
> > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc