| RE: [technology-pmc] Agenda for today's call |
I'd like to add a short discussion describing what we should be looking for in the various types of reviews; specifically, is there any documentation? Doug Schaefer recently asked us to comment on his move review slides for Photran and I'm not sure what we should be asking for. Wayne -- Wayne Beaton The Eclipse Foundation wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.eclipse.org http://wbeaton.blogspot.com/ http://www.planeteclipse.org/planet/ > -----Original Message----- > From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Bjorn Freeman-Benson > Sent: December 5, 2006 11:18 AM > To: technology-pmc > Subject: [technology-pmc] Agenda for today's call > > Tech PMC Members, > Here are some things I think we should talk about on today's call: > > > * EclipseCon - thanks to a last minute rush of > submissions, we have 3 submissions for 1 panel slot and 25 > submissions for 6 long talk slots. We should talk about > review criteria and commit to making public comments on the proposals. > * Laszlo Archive Review - there have been two notes of > complaint, but no groundswell of support: > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/laszlo-dev/msg00018.html > > http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.technology.laszl > o/msg00245.html > > * Website school - another one this week so we should get > a report from Ward on how that's going > > - Bjorn > >