Hello Bjorn,
Please go ahead and “un-committerize” the following
individuals:
-
Akheirolomoom
-
Bbrady
Kevin (kparker) is the ALF webmaster and has been updating the
ALF site frequently (almost weekly). Your inactivity data for Kevin is
not accurate. I am also going to resign as “ALF Project Lead”
and have Brian Carroll take over this responsibility. I will be working
with Brian to ensure a smooth transition. Needless to say, I will
continue to be heavily involved with the ALF initiative at the strategy and
direction level but Brian will assume the daily execution activities.
Brian and I will follow up separately with a formal request.
Thank you,
Ali.
From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson
[mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:31 PM
To: Ali Kheirolomoom
Cc: technology-pmc
Subject: Cleaning out inactive committers
Ali,
As part of the fall house cleaning, I noticed that three of the committers on
the ALF project appear to be inactive:
http://dash.eclipse.org/dash/commits/web-app/active-committers.cgi?project=technology.alf
akheirolomoom
bbrady
kparker
Note that being an inactive Committer does not mean that the people are inactive
on the project - I know, for example, that Kevin is very active in promoting
ALF around the world. As a committer, however, has not checked any code or web
pages into CVS in over nine months.
The Technology Charter requires that Committers stay active in the project:
http://www.eclipse.org/technology/technology-charter.html
"A Committer that ... does not participate actively, or has been inactive
for an extended period may have his or her commit status removed by the
PMC."
We ask that either:
- You explain why these people should continue to
be committers in spite of appearing inactive, or
- You tell us to "un-committerize" them.
Committers that are removed can, of course, be reinstated when they resume
their active work on the project.
Thank you.