Re: [swordfish-dev] Interceptor framework design options

[Gerald Preissler <gerald.preissler@xxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [swordfish-dev] Interceptor framework design options

I agree that it is not the interceptor’s business to decide whether it is to be called or not in a given context. But often the context also will drive the concrete functionality an interceptor will provide. An example: a message tracking interceptor would have to include this information in the tracking events. That’s the kind of situation that my question was aimed at.

regards
    Jerry


On 13.11.09 16:39, "Jürgen Kindler" <juergen.kindler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jerry,
>
> An interceptor could certainly try to figure out in which context is is being called, but in fact it is not desired.
> The interceptor should not actively need to “understand” for which context it gets activated (though implicitly it might be implemented for acting in a certain context!). It would be a matter of configuration about where a specific interceptor gets called.
>
> Cheers
>   Jürgen
>
> On 11/13/09 14:48, "Gerald Preissler" <gerald.preissler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I take it that there will be a way for an interceptor to figure out message exchange type, role and message? In that case I’d vote for Zsolts approach.
> >
> > regards
> >     Jerry
> >
> >
> > On 12.11.09 15:52, "Oliver Wolf" <oliver.wolf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear fellow Swordfishers,
> > >
> > > I've created a short Wiki article summarizing our design discussion on 
> > > the Interceptor framework:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Swordfish_Documentation:_Architecture:_Interceptor_Framework
> > >
> > > Please feel free to comment on and/or add to as you see fit.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > swordfish-dev mailing list
> > > swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev