| Re: [sumo-user] Use predefined routes in route distribution |
|
Hi, no, it is not the same. Your second option is not right. If you already defined a route, then you only need to add the “route” attribute to your vehicle element. <routes>
<route
id="route0"
color="1,1,0"
edges="beg
middle end rend"/>
<vehicle
id="0"
route="route0"
depart="0"
color="1,0,0"/> </routes> Your second example would be possible, if you are defining a new route as a child of your vehicle, like this: <routes>
<vehicle
id="0"
depart="0"
color="1,0,0">
<route
edges="beg
middle end rend"/>
</vehicle> </routes> See
https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles,_Vehicle_Types,_and_Routes.html#vehicles_and_routes
With routeDistribution, the definition of the routes according to the docu would be: <routes> <routeDistribution id="routedist1"> <route id="route_0" edges="beg middle end rend" probability="0.1" /> <route id="route_1" edges="beg middle2 end rend" probability="0.9" /> </routeDistribution> <vehicle id="0" depart="0" route="routedist1"/> </routes> Regards, Giuliana Von: sumo-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <sumo-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Im Auftrag von Theophile Cabannes Thank you Giuliana, However https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles,_Vehicle_Types,_and_Routes.html#route_distributions is a little bit
different as the routes in the route distributions in the example is not predefined outside the route distribution itself (i.e. the routes contain the attribute edges). If I can do what I have suggested, then I guess that the two following route files will be understand the same way: <routes>
<route
id="route0"
color="1,1,0"
edges="beg
middle end rend"/>
<vehicle
id="0"
route="route0"
depart="0"
color="1,0,0"/> </routes> end <routes>
<route
id="route0"
color="1,1,0"
edges="beg
middle end rend"/>
<vehicle
id="0"
depart="0"
color="1,0,0">
<route
id="route0"
/>
</vehicle> </routes> Is this correct? Thank you a lot! On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:05 PM <Maria.Armellini@xxxxxx> wrote:
|