Hi Jakob,
Thank you for your reply!
I attached the config and log files to my second e-mail, but they might got cut off by the mailing list. I'll resend it to you by direct message now.
Thank you,
Andras
Feladó: sumo-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <sumo-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>, meghatalmazó: Jakob Erdmann <namdre.sumo@xxxxxxxxx>
Elküldve: 2020. november 2., hétfő 9:01
Címzett: Sumo project User discussions <sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tárgy: Re: [sumo-user] Junction edge is not included in Route, Vehicle is being invisible while in junction
Hello again,
Not being impatient, just wondered if there are any updates on this, or if there is something I can do on my end to get the desired behavior.
Thank you,
Andras
Feladó: Andras Bondor <andras.bondor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Elküldve: 2020. október 9., péntek 17:22
Címzett: Sumo project User discussions <sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tárgy: Re: [sumo-user] Junction edge is not included in Route, Vehicle is being invisible while in junction
Hello Jakob,
Thank you for your quick reply. Please see attachment. The issue can be reproduced by starting to move forward with the remote-controlled vehicle after an arbitrary wait time.
Is this a configuration issue on my end?
Thank you again for your time!
Andras
Hello,
- internal edges are never included in a route definition (they can be deduced from the "normal" edges at simulation time)
regards,
Jakob
Hello,
I'm experiencing an interesting behavior when calculating a route that should contain a junction and when navigating over it using moveToXY().
First, I'm building a route for the remote-controlled vehicle by calling libsumo::Simulation::convertRoad() on the current and target positions.
Then I feed these two edge ids to libsumo::Simulation::findRoute() to get a route. The start route and end route are two straight lines, connected with a simple junction. I'm observing that the generated route only has 2 edges, the current and target edge,
but the edge in the junction is not included in the route.
Now if I start the simulation and I move my remote-controlled vehicle by calling the moveToXY() function the vehicle is correctly
positioned. I'm querying the edge id on each step and it correctly reports the starting, in-junction, and target edges as it moves over them.
However, while being in the junction, and being on the edge id which belongs to the junction (which isn't part of the route), the
vehicle seems to be invisible to other participants controlled by SUMO, and they simply drive through it. Once the remote-controlled vehicle is out of the junction, all other vehicles are correctly slow down around it not to collide. I
read that the in-junction collisions are expected if the remote-controlled vehicle doesn't have a route continuing after the end of the junction, but here it is not the case.
Originally I used version 1.6.0 but upgraded to 1.7.0 and I'm experiencing the same behavior.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you,
Andras
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized use, copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
|