Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[sumo-user] Realistic behavior for approaching intersections

Dear SUMO enthusiasts,

I am currently simulating trajectories approaching an intersection in SUMO and apply various statistical and machine learning methods aiming at inferring the traffic regulation of these trajectories (traffic light, stop, yield, yield to right etc.) afterwards. Small network cutouts are extracted via osmwebwizard, setting the correct traffic regulation or edge speed limits if necessary. Using Sumo 1.2.0

Therefore, I would like to use parameters modeling such vehicle behavior as good as possible. Using Krauss Car Following, I notice very unrealistic accelerations / decelerations approaching an intersection node (very high - almost each approach leads to the default maximum deceleration of the vType, at least for a simulation time step). Using IDM Car Following, vehicles approaching intersections have, for my understanding, a much more realistic character in terms of especially acceleration / deceleration but still some unrealistic ones (using set max deceleration of 4.5 m/s² when turning right e.g. from a priority regulated lane onto a yielding one - driving from yielding ones onto priority lanes it works fine with this car following model).

Parameters / settings I altered from default:
- simulation step length = 0.1 s
- junction internal links are enabled
- vType attributes passed to randomTrips generator (this is how I generate trips and convert those to routes via Duarouter):     - lcKeepRight="0" (to suppress lane changes after insertion with <departlane value="best" />)


I have tried:
- varying tau as vType attribute
- varying decel and emergencyDecel as vType attributes
- varying actionsteplength to values higher than simulation step length (I am aware that this triggers the usage of ballistic update method) - varying the visibility attribute of connections (my thought: a vehicle approaching notices intersection that contain connections with high visibility values earlier and decelerates smoother - but this parameter did not influence the behavior noticeably) Some of these variations enable me to change some simulation characteristics but it is hard for me to evaluate whether I alter SUMO default behavior (which I would like to leave untouched as much as possible) in a way that makes the whole simulation less realistic by applying stated changes.

I would be more than thankful if you could give me some opinions, which parameters can be "safely" varied and which Car Following Model yields the most realistic vehicle behavior when approaching intersections, in both cases with present lead vehicles or a "free" intersections.


Thank you very much

Best

Martin Trat



Back to the top