[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [stp-dev] Who's ready for M3 build?!
|
About those pesky version numbers:
should we have 1.1.0.qualifier in, or do we need to add a M3 prefix to the qualifier ? (1.1.0.M3-qualifier)
Cheers,
Antoine
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Oisin Hurley
<oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm going to build a candidate later today, and then you can check
it tomorrow, and if everything is sound, then I will publicise it later
tomorrow evening. How does that sound?
Ok, so who's ready early? ;)
BPMN -- Antoine you look you are ready to rock, right?
SCA -- Stephane, we just have to make sure those features are in there, right?
IM -- Adrian, Andrea, ready to go or need more time?
B2J -- Antony, this is stable, I'll assume it's ready to go?
EID -- Not ready
Policy -- Jerry, ready to get it on?
NOTE -- make sure you have your version numbers right, gentlemen.
ALSO -- don't forget your branching and your tagging strategies.
I'm looking to pick up off the "3.5M3" tag. Please apply this when
you are ready for this evening's candidate.
--oh
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
--
http://www.lunar-ocean.com/blog
