Skip to main content
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Hi guys,
This is to follow-up on our previous threads on the new SVN structure
proposed by Andrea and generally well-received by the STP community.
We had agreed that the new structure with trunk/branch/tags for each
individual project is the way to go and I think Oisin raised some
concern about the Ganymede M4 release and the timing for this change.
I am much in favour of not duplicating any work and I think that the
sooner we move to the new structure, the better, in order to avoid
changes later on. This is particularly relevant for our upcoming
commit of plugins to the STP-IM repository where everything has been
thought of with the new structure in mind. So my question is, can we
go ahead now with the new structure or must we go with the old
structure and change it at a later date? Suppose we go with the new
structure on a project-by-project basis, would this impact the build
system and if so, how much? If there's some tweaking to be done for
the projects following the new structure, I would rather do that than
change our code structure to be in line with the old layout (and then
change it again later :) ).
Oisin, what is your take on this? Is this doable or would it entail
too many complications on the STP/Ganymede release plan?
Thanks,
Adrian.
Back to the top