Re: [stem-dev] Unofficial STEM version control?

[Tero Parviainen <tero.parviainen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Guys!

I now have a clone of trunk at http://github.com/teropa/stem/
I'll keep a clean mirror in the "eclipse.org" branch, and do my work in "master" and other branches.

-tero

________________________________________
From: stem-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [stem-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthew Davis [mattadav@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 14 September 2010 20:44
To: STEM developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [stem-dev] Unofficial STEM version control?

Hi Tero,

I think a GitHub account is great.  It will offer a good source
history/pedigree for Eclipse legal to perform due diligence when (if) you
opt to contribute source code back to STEM.  As Dan mentioned, the Eclipse
Public License provides a lot of flexibility when it comes to
redistribution, so there should be no legal issues if you need to copy
STEM source into your repository.

-Matt


stem-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/14/2010 09:55:46 AM:

> From: Tero Parviainen <tero.parviainen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "stem-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <stem-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 09/14/2010 09:56 AM
> Subject: [stem-dev] Unofficial STEM version control?
> Sent by: stem-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
>
> As I start to do more experimentation with server-side STEM, I'd
> like to have my work available in version control somewhere.
> Is there some unofficial SVN repo for STEM that I could use? If not,
> do you mind if I host a "modified" fork the trunk on my Github
> account? That way I'd be able to keep up with trunk as well as
> extract clean, up-to-date patches later when I have something to
> contribute upstream.
>
> Br,
> Tero
> _______________________________________________
> stem-dev mailing list
> stem-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stem-dev

_______________________________________________
stem-dev mailing list
stem-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stem-dev