[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [soa-iwg] ECF and SOA initiative
|
Hi Ricco,
RE: the proposed roadmap: I'm a little surprised that there doesn't seem
to be any mention of OSGi standards work on distribution/remoting (i.e.
RFC119) and the associated Runtime project work (i.e. Equinox and ECF)
on implementing those OSGi 4.2 specs.
Things like service registrys, brokers, esbs/messaging, etc are
certainly mentioned in the roadmap, but there isn't any connection (that
I can detect) to whats going on in the OSGi standardization world in
terms of specification (OSGi 4.2/Service Registry/RFC 119) or Equinox
implemention of specs (in ECF 3.0 and beyond).
OSGi services, remoting, distribution, discovery, messaging is where ECF
is focusing it's attention WRT service-oriented architecture, and this
roadmap doesn't have anything about those (OSGi/Equinox) pieces at all
as far as I can tell. This seems like a large omission to me.
I understand the desire to stick closely to SCA (for example), but it's
pretty clear (to me at least) that OSGi 4.2/RFC119 is going to be an
important way forward into SOA for OSGi-based runtimes...and so it seems
to me that a reasonably comprehensive SOA initiative at the Eclipse
Foundation would want to include that. Is that incorrect?
Scott
Ricco Deutscher wrote:
Scott,
Would it be possible to refocus the discussion to the actual SOA content?
I’d love to get your feedback to the proposed roadmap.
Especially I would like to hear from you what ECF could bring to the
table.
Please find attached the latest version 0.3 from Zsolt including the
Guiding Principles for the roadmap the group agreed upon.
Best,
Ricco
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
soa-iwg mailing list
soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
