[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [science-pmc] ChemClipse / Retire Project Lead
|
Jay,
thanks for your feedback.
I'll search for the link in the dashbord.
Best,
Philip
On 09.06.22 14:13, Jay Jay Billings
wrote:
Philip,
I believe you have to go to your project dashboard and
start the retirement process from there. I did this about 3
years ago for some ICE committers and there's just a little
link for it. Let me know if you can't find it, but that will
start the official retirement process.
Philip and Christoph,
Thanks for the additional information you shared about your
experiences, but there is nothing I can do with it. I
recommend you reach out to the EMO if you want to explore
these issues further.
Jay
Dear
PMC,
good, please retire Christoph Läubrich.
Just for clarification/further considerations:
* Creating a new release and enabling an API baseline for the
next
version is on our agenda.
* Reasonable change request were ignored by Christoph, see for
example [1].
* It's correct, that we once made a mistake by generating
getter/setter
code and not keeping the original copyright header [2]. We
learned from
this case. But it seems that Christoph handles the issue with
the
copyright headers not with the same priority when it comes to
his own
changes. Have a look at two examples [3]. If you need more
cases, please
let me know.
* A release is overdue, that's correct. Migrating from Java 8
to 11 was
a main issue for the last time, which has been recently
addressed and
solved.
* Lablicate has not sued Christoph for using ChemClipse source
code. He
also knows it. This is again a smoke candle.
As Christoph is actively working on his proprietary solution,
based on
ChemClipse, I would be really interested to know if he has
created a
private fork of the Eclipse ChemClipse and SWTChart projects.
Best,
Philip
[1] https://github.com/eclipse/chemclipse/issues/405
[2] https://github.com/eclipse/chemclipse/issues/407
[3] Copyright Header Issues:
[a] vs. [b]
EvenOddValidator vs. InputValidator
SettingsClassParser vs. SettingsSupport
[c] vs. [d]
org.eclipse.chemclipse.chromatogram.xxd.peak.detector.supplier.firstderivative.core.BasePeakDetector
[a]
https://github.com/eclipse/chemclipse/commit/14819f8d921c22d011a177be9c67fdd700fa312d
[b]
https://github.com/eclipse/chemclipse/commit/d56ff87a696f36c6964f6d0cf0d409869926437a
[c]
https://github.com/eclipse/chemclipse/commit/feb2f1ba9fbf5db3fe422e3ae3cc1bf73c3c76c2
[d]
https://github.com/eclipse/chemclipse/commit/de2cc42705286ac7a8b3b4d03d411cf7aeb0d764
On 09.06.22 09:31, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
> Hi PMC/EMO,
>
> I'm fine with retirement, as from my experiences
ChemClipse is
> effectively a project only managed for the whole purpose
of Lablicate
> GmbH, so you are either working for Lablicate GmbH or it
is impossible
> to make substantial contributions:
>
> - issues are created and instantly fixed by a commit so
no way to
> really participate here, as there is no API baseline
constantly break
> existing code without any notice
> - on the other hand code contributed by me are just
reverted/removed
> or even reclaimed as own code, my request to just working
on distinct
> branches was rejected
> - No releases for years or even a downloads of ChemClipse
(beside
> building from source), so there is no real way for any
community
> wanting to actually use it as is, as a real open-source
solution
> without any additional terms
> - Lablicate GmbH even tried to sue me on court for
offering solutions
> based on ChemClipse
>
> So for me ChemClipse is just a dead-end for any
open-source minded
> contributor and I thus won't mind leaving it.
>
> Anyways it was fun to work on ChemClipse and I wish all
the best to
> current and future contributors and of course the whole
science
> community.
>
> Have a good day,
> Christoph
>
>
> Am 09.06.22 um 06:54 schrieb Philip Wenig:
>> Dear PMC,
>>
>> I would like to retire Christoph Läubrich as a
project lead /
>> committer of ChemClipse:
>> https://github.com/eclipse/chemclipse
>>
>> Christoph has not taken any actions since April 15th
2020 on ChemClipse:
>> https://github.com/eclipse/chemclipse/commits?author=laeubi
>>
>> My relation to Christoph is problematic. He worked
two years for my
>> company Lablicate GmbH. Eventually, in February 2020
he had to go due
>> to several reasons. I kept him in the position of a
project lead /
>> committer for 2 years now to see if he will keep on
supporting the
>> project, despite of our conflict. As it turned out,
he offers a
>> similar software, based on ChemClipse, since 2020:
>>
>> https://labratry.de/en
>>
>> As he didn't do any commits on ChemClipse but seems
to be very active
>> on his own project, I assume that he either just
consumes the
>> ChemClipse bundles as is or has deeply forked the
source code of
>> ChemClipse.
>>
>> That's the reason why I'd like to retire him as a
project lead /
>> committer.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Philip
>>
> _______________________________________________
> science-pmc mailing list
> science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OpenChrom - the open source alternative for chromatography /
mass spectrometry
Dr. Philip Wenig » Founder » philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
» http://www.openchrom.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
science-pmc mailing list
science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc
--
Jay Jay Billings, Ph.D.
Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings
_______________________________________________
science-pmc mailing list
science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OpenChrom - the open source alternative for chromatography / mass spectrometry
Dr. Philip Wenig » Founder » philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx » http://www.openchrom.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~