| Hello every one, It was great to be part of it ( even with my small project ) . A lot of ideas , a lot of cleverness .. Christopher, you beat me with the mythical destination beach .
I remember going to a geocache with one of you .. near Washington .. Amazing ..
Every one, have beautiful and calm beach and big fish .
Brigitte
Writing as perhaps the only retired person on this list, I warmly
accept the Science Working Group joining me in retirement! I'll
happily buy the SWG an early afternoon drink with an umbrella the
next time I see the SWG on the beach in the mythical retirement
tropical destination beach of my mind. More seriously, things come, things go. As a project manager
I've been told that the stages of a project are forming, storming,
norming, performing and mourning.
Put a fork in it, it is done!
Matt beat me to it about the fish... _Christopher
On 10/28/22 4:37 PM, Matthew Gerring
wrote:
Yes for me it became bureaucracy for no purpose
but i shall remember the meetings and ideas for collaborations
fondly. Particularly the visits to Trondheim the marine research
institute, Tennessee the Oak Ridge Lab and the airplane factory
in Toulouse.
So long and thanks for all the fish.
Thanks Jay,
> 28. okt. 2022 kl. 22:09 skrev Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Torkild,
>
> I've been waiting for a long time now for you to nominate
me to the SC since we updated the charter and
committer-members can take on SC roles, but they can only be
nominated by current SC members. I probably should have synced
up with you about this. Or did we do this and I just forgot
about it?
I think I somehow overlooked that opportunity to nominate you.
My apologies. Even so, it would take more than the two of us
to make a Working Group serve its purpose. My day job no
longer allows this effort. So for my part it would be on my
spare time.
>
> But, I don't think it matters now and it is clearly an
indicator of how low our activity has been. I believe that you
are correct to make a motion that we should retire the working
group. Please allow me to follow suit with Philip and second
that motion. We can sync up with EF to figure out the next
steps.
>
> I am also concerned that the PMC and TLP are defunct.
After taking over as PMC chair, I emailed the list several
times to ask for project leads to join a meeting and I think
Philip was the only person to respond. I believe that we
should ask the EMO for guidance on this and make moves to
adjust membership and retire projects as needed.
Yes, even if we do retire the Working Group. I don’t feel like
much is lost. Many enough of us are still around to keep at
least some of the projects going. So I agree we should focus
on getting the PMC working in a good manner. If opportunity
arises to do more, we can. Retiring the Working Group is
simply good bookkeeping.
I do support asking the EMO for guidance. But as you may
remember, this process is already in work. TeXlipse for
example was about to be retired just recently.
>
> If anyone wants to throw tomatoes at me, please do: They
are one of my favorite fruits!
I’m not growing tomatoes, but I do have a five Trinidad Naga
Scorpion, and one Scottish Black Bonnet bushes thriving. I
might throw something, but I fear you will like it too much
;-)
>
> Jay
Missed you at EclipseCon. Maybe next time Jay,
Torkild
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
_______________________________________________ science-iwg mailing list science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxxTo unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
|
