Hello Christopher;
Thank you for contacting us
concerning the release schedule. Now is the time to
ensure the IP Team has on its radar any outstanding IP
requests (CQs) required for the release train.
According to this email, it is
our understanding the following CQ’s are required:
12551 TeXlipse initial
contribution (Type B)
14161 ptolemy.moml 11.1 (Type A)
Subsequently, the following CQs
are not required:
12753 science.scanning
Initial
13917 XACC Initial Contribution
13673 Apache PDFBox Version: 2.0.6
Can you please
confirm our understanding is correct in order for us to
plan accordingly in order to meet the project schedule?
We look forward
to working with Science for a successful release train!
Best Regards,
Sharon Corbett
Manager, Intellectual Property
----------
Forwarded message ----------
From: Christopher Brooks < >
Date: Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:10 AM
Subject: The Eclipse Science 2017 Release: Oct. 10, 2017
To: emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Science Industry Working Group <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear EMO team,
We are hoping to have the The Eclipse Science 2017
Release out on October 10, 2017, which is two weeks
before EclipseCon Europe.
See https://wiki.eclipse.org/Science_WG/2017_Release
for a list of participating Science projects. Today the
list is:
Eclipse EASE
Eclipse EAVP
Eclipse January
Rich Beans
TeXlipse
Triquetrum
We were thinking of submitting our material for review
on Friday, September 22. Is that enough time for the
review process to meet the Tuesday, October 10 release
date?
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#release-review
says:
Release reviews run for a week and always conclude
on a Wednesday.
![Note](pngr4UOhRN5Vk.png)
|
We schedule reviews to
conclude on the 'first and third Wednesdays
of the month'. Your release date does not
have to coincide with the review date (you
can set the release date as necessary). The
review must, however, conclude successfully
before you can make the release official.
|
A 'release review' requires review documentation
and an intellectual property (IP) log check. The
review process must be initiated at least two weeks
in advance of the anticipated 'review' date.
_Christopher
--
Christopher Brooks, PMP
Academic Program Manager
iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm
University of California, Berkeley
707.332.0670, cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxx, https://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cxh