[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon
|
Hei Philip,
Indeed it was a nice BoF, thanks all.
On the way back I sketched an idea regarding a possible structure to group the individual contributions/wishes (see attached graphic):
- Presentation
2D, 3D, nD visualisation, data selection, oscilloscope, xygraph, image viewing, histograms, ...
- Representation
meta-models/models, units, scientific constants, generic nD-data structures, ...
- Processing
workflow, distributed execution, data transformations, data filtering, ...
- Persistence
scientific file formats, HDF5, databases, long term archiving, ...
What do you guys think about this draft? Should I apply this to the information we gathered in the wiki?
Cheers
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: science-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:science-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Wenig
Sent: 01 November 2013 14:17
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon
Hi folks,
the BoF was fantastic, wasn't it!
I really feel that the time has come to bring our idea of a scientific working group to reality :-).
Best
Philip
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Philip Wenig
http://www.openchrom.net
https://www.xing.com/profile/Philip_Wenig
http://de.linkedin.com/pub/philip-wenig/2a/4a8/877
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
Attachment:
Structure.png
Description: Structure.png