| Re: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon |
Hei Philip, Indeed it was a nice BoF, thanks all. On the way back I sketched an idea regarding a possible structure to group the individual contributions/wishes (see attached graphic): - Presentation 2D, 3D, nD visualisation, data selection, oscilloscope, xygraph, image viewing, histograms, ... - Representation meta-models/models, units, scientific constants, generic nD-data structures, ... - Processing workflow, distributed execution, data transformations, data filtering, ... - Persistence scientific file formats, HDF5, databases, long term archiving, ... What do you guys think about this draft? Should I apply this to the information we gathered in the wiki? Cheers Tim -----Original Message----- From: science-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:science-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Wenig Sent: 01 November 2013 14:17 To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon Hi folks, the BoF was fantastic, wasn't it! I really feel that the time has come to bring our idea of a scientific working group to reality :-). Best Philip -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dr. Philip Wenig http://www.openchrom.net https://www.xing.com/profile/Philip_Wenig http://de.linkedin.com/pub/philip-wenig/2a/4a8/877 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ science-iwg mailing list science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
Attachment:
Structure.png
Description: Structure.png
