From: Thomas Watson [mailto:tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: August-22-12 10:28 AM
To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; Runtime Project PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] Juno Retrospective
I agree with your points Mike and I would like to hear from Jesse what improvements can be made to the process and what value could be added that would have kept jetty on the release train.
Tom
"Mike Milinkovich" ---08/22/2012 09:16:06 AM---Just a suggestion - feel free to ignore.
Just a suggestion - feel free to ignore.
It seems to me that we have a general issue with EclipseRT and the release train. More specifically, I think there is a sense that the release train is of less value to the RT projects. Or that the process is more burdensome for them. Jetty's recent announcement that they're not planning to participate in Kepler is a concrete example of this.
Perhaps a general conversation about what makes the release train more difficult or of less value to the RT projects would be helpful? What could be done to change that for the RT community?
Of course, it's possible that I am completely out to lunch on this perception. It wouldn't be the first time :)
From: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Bull
Sent: August-22-12 9:49 AM
To: Runtime Project PMC mailing list
Subject: [rt-pmc] Juno Retrospective
Hi everyone,
The planning council is interested in feedback on the Juno Release. If you have anything (good or bad) that you would like to add to the Juno Retrospective, please follow up here and I'll pass the comments along to the planning council.
Also, the Kepler schedule has been finalized. You can see it here [1].
[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Kepler/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Schedule
Cheers,
Ian
--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
