Skip to main content
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
In the absence of a formal process (assuming that "everybody jumps in
when they feel inspired" does not count as a formal process) the CQs do
not seem to be getting discussed/approved, which kind of makes progress
difficult. For example, by my count there are 16 CQ's waiting for
approval for the Virgo project and 3 for the Gemini Web project. I could
go through and look at each of these, but am frankly a little hesitant
given that a) there may be some history that I am not aware of wrt to a
particular library b) it doesn't seem quite above board for one person
to go through and approve everything for a given project. Can we at
least have a standing PMC meeting agenda item to look at existing open
CQs waiting for approval and give everyone in the meeting a chance to
look at them and state whether they think there would be any issues?
This would not preclude the existing casual individual approvals from
occurring, but would at least make sure that a CQ is only ever in the
"waiting for approval" state for a maximum of 2 weeks (though in
practice it would be much less). Thoughts?
Back to the top