Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rmf-dev] Minimum requirements for RMF (Java, Eclipse, EMF)

Hi Dennis,

Do I understand you correctly, that the latest emf-base is already ready for my purposes?  Where do I get it?  I checked [1], but there I only find the EMF SDK, which requires Eclipse 3.8.  I could not find emf-base in that repository.

Thanks,

- Michael

[1] http://download.eclipse.org/releases/juno


On 02/09/2012 10:21 AM, Dennis Hübner wrote:
Hi Michael,
emf-base is already Galileo compatible, I'm currently
working on the rest of emf. Hopefully it's done for M6, so it's available in Juno p2 repository.

Regards,
Dennis. 

Am 09.02.2012 um 10:15 schrieb Michael Jastram:

Hi Ed,

We're just setting up builds so that EMF 2.8 will work with Eclipse 3.5: 

Sweet - this is obviously a much better solution.  I was not aware of this.  I take it that I have to wait until #370942 is resolved?  The 2.8 on the Juno update site still has dependencies to 3.8.

Best,

- Michael


https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=370942
Working with recent version is a much better way to ensure you'll get support for your problems.  We're highly unlike to fix problems in EMF 2.6 and I'm sure you'll never get fixes for Eclipse 3.6 problems other than in 4.2 or maybe, if you're lucky, in Eclipse 3.8.

Cheers,
Ed


On 08/02/2012 2:33 PM, Michael Jastram wrote:
Hello RMF Committers,

The other day we had a telco where we discussed what the minimum
requirements for RMF should be.  In order to support as many other
projects as possible, we proposed Java 1.5 and Eclipse 3.6.

I already downgraded Java to 1.5, which was not problematic.

Switching to Eclipse 3.6, however, also requires us to downgrade to EMF
2.6 (from 2.7).  This in turn will require regenerating code (mainly due
to EMF 2.6 missing the Switch class).  All in all it doesn't look like a
big deal.  Still, before I proceed: Does anybody have comments or concerns?

@Ed (and all others): Are there any important features that we would
loose by downgrading to EMF 2.6?

If there are no objections, I'll refactor on Friday (Feb. 10).

Thanks,

- Michael



-- 
Michael Jastram (http://www.jastram.de, +49 (162) 274 83 94)
Geschäftsführer, Formal Mind GmbH (http://formalmind.com)
Wissenschaftler, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf (http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de)
1. Vorsitzender, rheinjug e.V. (http://www.rheinjug.de)

_______________________________________________
rmf-dev mailing list
rmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rmf-dev



_______________________________________________
rmf-dev mailing list
rmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rmf-dev


-- 
Michael Jastram (http://www.jastram.de, +49 (162) 274 83 94)
Geschäftsführer, Formal Mind GmbH (http://formalmind.com)
Wissenschaftler, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf (http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de)
1. Vorsitzender, rheinjug e.V. (http://www.rheinjug.de)


Back to the top