[rdf4j-dev] Switch from rdf4j-runtime to storage in our docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[rdf4j-dev] Switch from rdf4j-runtime to storage in our docs

From: Håvard Ottestad <hmottestad@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 21:30:31 +0200
Delivered-to: rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/rdf4j-dev>
List-help: <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev>, <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/rdf4j-dev>, <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

I've noticed that we've switched from the old rdf4j-runtime dependency to the storage one on our main "downloads" page for how to get started.

Unless I'm mistaken, this means we no longer package any of the rio stuff.

What was the rational for not using runtime anymore?

Håvard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rdf4j-dev] Switch from rdf4j-runtime to storage in our docs
  - From: Jeen Broekstra

Prev by Date: [rdf4j-dev] 3.1.3 patch release tomorrow
Next by Date: Re: [rdf4j-dev] Switch from rdf4j-runtime to storage in our docs
Previous by thread: [rdf4j-dev] 3.1.3 patch release tomorrow
Next by thread: Re: [rdf4j-dev] Switch from rdf4j-runtime to storage in our docs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top