| Re: [rdf4j-dev] SHACL and checking rdfs:Resource |
|
Hi Håvard, Seems like it was a (automated ?) translation of the ontology into the SHACL file
(rdfs:range => sh:class, which is perfectly fine for other scenarios,
but in this case the intended rule is more akin to sh:nodeKind sh:IRI or sh:IRIOrLiteral) It’s been changed in the SHACL, but I’ll probably have to check other EU Core Vocabularies SHACLs
😊 Thanks for the heads-up on the reasoner, I think the console verify command doesn’t enable this by default, so I’d better add a toggle or setting (and some documentation) Best regards Bart From: rdf4j-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <rdf4j-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Håvard M. Ottestad Hi Bart, It should match everything as you say. And that might even work if you use it with the RDFS reasoner. Which I have not tried! There is some rudimentary support for rdfs as part of the shacl standard, namely support for rdfs:subClassOf. Which is implemented. I don’t know what they think about rdfs:Resource though. In practice, right now, I think it would only match those subjects with explicit type for rdfs:Resource. Håvard
|