Re: [rdf4j-dev] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: rdf4j-1.0-verify #21

[Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nono, both 2.0 and the master branch are Java 8, so you can use that. We occasionally merge 2.0 back to 1.0 and then fix the syntax to Java 7 in the 1.0 branch. This is expected :)

Jeen

--
sent from my phone

On 7/09/2016 3:45 AM, "Jacek Grzebyta" <grzebyta.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Jeen. So branch 2.0.x should follow java-7 syntax. Am I right?

Jacek

On 5 September 2016 at 01:09, Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 5/09/16 11:52, Peter Ansell wrote:

There is a lambda on that line, but 1.0.x is Java-7:

https://github.com/eclipse/rdf4j/blob/releases/1.0.x/core/sail/spin/src/test/java/org/eclipse/rdf4j/sail/spin/SpifSailTest.java#L295

I'll fix that.

Cheers,

Jeen