| Re: [rap-dev] Move WAR Products to RAP Tools? |
Hi, the last bug I fixed was more than 2 years ago. The products are rock solid. Most of the bugs are missing features. So, the maintenance effort should be a minimum. Cheers Holger Follow me: @hstaudacher Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH hstaudacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tel: +49 721 - 66 47 33 - 0 Fax: +49 721 - 66 47 33 29 ========================= Legal Disclaimer ========================= According to Section 80 of the German Corporation Act Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH must indicate the following information: Address: Lammstr. 21, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany General Manager: Jochen Krause Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883 ==================================================================== On 17 Sep 2014, at 10:34, Ivan Furnadjiev <ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > to be honest, I'm still using the WAR Products when I want to create a WAR from my workspace bundles (instead from target/p2 repo). This is useful for testing, debugging and resolving deployment problems with current workspace RAP bundles. That's why I like the idea to keep the WAR Products alive, but I can't estimate the maintenance effort it requires. > Regards, > Ivan > > On 9/16/2014 5:56 PM, Ralf Sternberg wrote: >> Hi RAP devs, >> >> The WAR Products tooling that is currently hosted by the Eclipse Libra >> project [1] which started to develop enterprise tools for OSGi. This >> project is now unmaintained and about to be terminated [2]. Should we >> adopt the WAR Products tooling in RAP Tools? >> >> Pro: >> - we advertise this tooling in our developer's guide >> - we know that it is used by some parts of our community >> - it depends only on PDE, has a tycho build, moving should be pretty painless >> >> Contra: >> - it's not specific to RAP >> - we'd take over the responsibility for it (not sure if it uses PDE internals) >> - we'd also adopt the bugs (am I right that there are 32 ones open?) >> - AFAIK, we don't use this tooling anymore by ourselves in favor of >> automated tycho builds >> >> Thoughts? Alternatives? >> >> Regards, Ralf >> >> [1] https://www.eclipse.org/libra/ >> [2] https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/libra-dev/msg00172.html >> [3] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=WAR%20Products&list_id=10070853&product=Libra&query_format=advanced >> _______________________________________________ >> rap-dev mailing list >> rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > rap-dev mailing list > rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail