Re: AW: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: AW: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?

From: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:56:38 -0500
Delivered-to: rap-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/rap-dev>
List-help: <mailto:rap-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev>, <mailto:rap-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rap-dev>, <mailto:rap-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> Contributing such a thing also requires some legal reviews. As I can see > FCKEditor is licenced under GPL, LGPL and MPL and at the moment I'm not > sure if this is compilant with EPL. This means that using FCKEditor as > rich text component in RAP is only possible IF the licences work > together, if not we could only host the EPL part (the wrapper).
MPL 1.1 is compatible with the EPL so if FCKEditor is licensed under MPL 1.1, you would be good to go if the code pedigree is solid.
Cheers, ~ Chris

References:
- AW: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?
  - From: Frank Appel
- RE: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?
  - From: Jochen Krause
- Re: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?
  - From: Mike Wrighton
- Re: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?
  - From: Lars Martin
- AW: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?
  - From: Stefan Roeck
- Re: AW: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?
  - From: Benjamin Muskalla

Prev by Date: Re: [rap-dev] Cell editors in Table or TreeTable
Next by Date: RE: [rap-dev] Q: Connections between RAP and Riena ?
Previous by thread: Re: AW: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?
Next by thread: AW: [rap-dev] Is RAP sufficient to build web-based IDEs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs