[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Hi Christopher
5 Bugzillas pushed to master. Thank you for your efforts.
Can you please provide a user-focussed half-line description of
what is good/what is not bad about each user-visible Bugzilla for
the N&N.
And perhaps a paragraph explaining the general progress on
blackboxes, referring to a Wiki entry/Help documentation if
something more substantial is appropriate.
Regards
Ed
On 18/02/2021 14:46, Gerking,
Christopher (KASTEL) wrote:
Hi
Ed
Thanks,
Java2QVTTypeResolver looks good.
Kind
regards
Christopher
Hi Chrstopher
I've rebased 5 of your branches so that they sequence without
complicated merges. Tests all pass.
Ready to push to master as soon as I can force push to undo
the Bug 566236 commits. If the webmasters don't respond 'soon'
we'll have to go for the revert commit approach and rebase
again.
You might want to double check Java2QVTTypeResolver.java
which had a non-trivial merge conflict to resolve.
Regards
Ed
On 17/02/2021 20:08, Gerking, Christopher
(KASTEL) wrote:
Hi Ed,
you were right, thanks for the hint.
So I will provide a rebased branch for bug
566236 as well.
Kind regards
Christopher
Hi
I've seen mismatching signer with the platform when plugin
and fragment come from different builds; typically because
the platform releng update the plugin but fail to realize
they must then force a rebuild of the fragment. Bugzilla
outstanding after I was bitten a second time.
I've seen mismatching signer from Xtext when I checkout a
plugin and fail to checkout another plugin that contributes
to the same package as the other plugin; dreadful releng
practice. Bugzilla outstanding.
I suggest avoiding any bonus checkouts in your workspace
and use a major platform release.
Regards
Ed
On 16/02/2021 12:31, Gerking,
Christopher (KASTEL) wrote:
Hi
Ed
Done. The following branches are all based
on master. If I’m not mistaken, the first one (bug
472482) had already been approved by you (see bugzilla).
1. https://git.eclipse.org/c/mmt/org.eclipse.qvto.git/log/?h=cgerking/472482
2. https://git.eclipse.org/c/mmt/org.eclipse.qvto.git/log/?h=cgerking/562175
3. https://git.eclipse.org/c/mmt/org.eclipse.qvto.git/log/?h=cgerking/565747
4. https://git.eclipse.org/c/mmt/org.eclipse.qvto.git/log/?h=cgerking/566216
5. https://git.eclipse.org/c/mmt/org.eclipse.qvto.git/log/?h=cgerking/566230
I was also trying to set up bug 566236, but
I can’t get QVTo’s standalone test to run (class
TestQvtStandaloneExecutor):
“java.lang.SecurityException: class
"org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin"'s signer information
does not match signer information of other classes in
the same package”
Do you have any idea what this is about?
Kind
regards
Christopher
Hi
Just checking where we are. Seems that I created a 2021-03 (3.10.3) release
record.
Currently the only semi-non-releng tweak on master is a
deprecations fix.
If you rebase you contributions on master so that they
look ready, I can review them and may be we can have a
genuine progress for 3.10.3.
Regards
Ed
_______________________________________________
qvto-dev mailing list
qvto-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/qvto-dev
_______________________________________________
qvto-dev mailing list
qvto-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/qvto-dev
_______________________________________________
qvto-dev mailing list
qvto-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/qvto-dev