[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ptp-dev] Juno will be Eclipse 4.2-based -- FYI/heads up
|
I expect CDT to support both. The 4.x backwards compatibility layer is apparently pretty good. That would also mean RSE should support both since we both depend on that.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Greg Watson
<g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maintaining two versions will probably be impossible for us given resource constraints, so we'll need to decide to go one way or the other at some point. Of course, we are dependent on CDT, so their decision will impact on us also.
Greg
On May 6, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
While not written in stone, that is the intent. The question still remains whether we'll also produce a 3.8 based stack. But as Andrew mentioned, get your feedback in to your project lead and we'll send it up the chain.
Doug (your Tools PMC dude).
I have heard of this in other venues but this is the most succinctly-stated i have seen.
So just consider it a heads-up for PTP (as well as for linuxtools which is where this came from)
...Beth
Beth Tibbitts
Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511
----- Forwarded by Beth Tibbitts/Watson/IBM on 05/06/2011 04:03 PM -----
<ecblank.gif>
| <ecblank.gif> |
<ecblank.gif>
| <ecblank.gif>
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<ecblank.gif>
| <ecblank.gif>
05/06/2011 10:37 AM
|
<ecblank.gif>
| <ecblank.gif>
[linuxtools-dev] Juno will be Eclipse 4.2-based
|
<ecblank.gif>
| <ecblank.gif> |
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev