Re: [ptp-dev] PE proxy changes for process model id to taskid change

[Dave Wootton <dwootton@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Randy
I think I have proxy_events.c ptp_3_0
restored and the branch properly updated.
Dave

From:	Randy Roberts <rsqrd@xxxxxxxx>
To:	Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	04/19/2010 11:52 AM
Subject:	Re: [ptp-dev] PE proxy changes for process model id to taskid change
Sent by:	ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Dave,

I've added org.eclipse.ptp.proxy to the branch.  Why
don't you commit those changes to the
branch and re-commit the older version of proxy_event.c
(1.17) to the ptp_3_0 branch.

HEAD still points to 1.17, so nothing needs to be done
there.

Regards,
R^2
--
Randy M. Roberts
rsqrd@xxxxxxxx
work: (505)665-4285

"In my many years I have come to a conclusion
 that one useless man is a shame, two
is a law firm,
 and three or more is a congress."
           
          -- John Adams

On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Dave Wootton wrote:


Randy 
I missed that org.eclipse.ptp.proxy was ptp_3_0 (head) only. This should
have also gone into your branch, so that project should be added to the
branch. Do I need to do anything for this? Should the ptp_3_0 copy be backed
out since this breaks head? 
Dave

From:	Randy Roberts <rsqrd@xxxxxxxx>
To:	Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	04/19/2010 11:22 AM
Subject:	Re: [ptp-dev] PE proxy changes for process model id to taskid change
Sent by:	ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Talking about tags...

Dave,

I noticed that one of your recent commits,
proxy_event.c, was to the "ptp_3_0" branch.

My guess is that you wanted this to be on the PTP_TRY_RMR_20100325
branch, but that org.eclipse.ptp.proxy wasn't put on that branch.

Should put that project onto the branch?  I can then merge you're
ptp_3_0 changes onto it.

Regards,
R^2
--
Randy M. Roberts
rsqrd@xxxxxxxx
work: (505)665-4285

"If you are planning for a year,
        sow rice;
 if you are planning for a decade,
        plant trees;
 if you are planning for a lifetime,
        educate people"
                    
                  A Chinese
Proverb

On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Albert L. Rossi wrote:

Since these protocol issues are proxy-related, I just assumed that  
Roland and Dieter would be looking into these.

As for the error you're getting Greg, I'm still working out of git, so
 
I'm not sure what is really going on.  There has been a refactoring
of  
some functionality out of PBS into a package  
org.eclipse.ptp.rm.proxy.core, but my current installation (which is  
our git HEAD) doesn't compile because it can't find those classes ...

I think I may be on the wrong branch ?

Al

----- Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I assume Roland and/or Al are looking at PBS.
>
> Greg
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Randy Roberts wrote:
>
>> Greg,
>>
>> As soon as the SLURM changes are in I'll wait for your
>> go-ahead to merge the branch changes onto HEAD.
>>
>> Oh, what about PBS?  Is that being handled too?
>>
>> R^2
>> --
>> Randy M. Roberts
>> rsqrd@xxxxxxxx
>> work: (505)665-4285
>>
>> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary
>> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -- Benjamin
Franklin
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 6:58 AM, Dave Wootton wrote:
>>
>>
>> Randy
>> I committed the changes for the PE and LoadLeveler proxies as
well  
>> as the changes I needed in org.eclipse.ptp.proxy/src/proxy_event.c.
 
>> Jie is going to handle SLURM.
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> From:                
Randy Roberts <rsqrd@xxxxxxxx>
>> To:                 Parallel
Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date:                
04/16/2010 04:55 PM
>> Subject:                
Re: [ptp-dev] PE proxy changes for process model id to  
>> taskid change
>> Sent by:                
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> Who will be taking care of making the changes to SLURM and PBS?
>>
>> I've taken care of MPICH and OpenMPI, so what other RMs are left
to
>> do?
>>
>> Regards,
>> R^2
>> -- 
>> Randy M. Roberts
>> rsqrd@xxxxxxxx
>> work: (505)665-4285
>>
>> "If you are planning for a year,
>>        sow rice;
>> if you are planning for a decade,
>>        plant trees;
>> if you are planning for a lifetime,
>>        educate people"
>>                  
                    A
Chinese Proverb
>>
>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Dave Wootton wrote:
>>
>>
>> Randy
>> I tested the LoadLeveler proxy changes and it looks like those
are  
>> working correctly. Let me know when it's ok to commit these changes
 
>> for the PE and LoadLeveler proxies
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> From:                
Randy Roberts <rsqrd@xxxxxxxx>
>> To:                 Parallel
Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date:                
04/12/2010 04:25 PM
>> Subject:                
Re: [ptp-dev] PE proxy changes for process model id to  
>> taskid change
>> Sent by:                
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> OK. Then I won't wait for your commits to do the merge of Greg's
 
>> changes.
>>
>> Regards,
>> R^2
>> -- 
>> Randy M. Roberts
>> rsqrd@xxxxxxxx
>> work: (505)665-4285
>>
>> "This is how Liberty dies - with thunderous applause."
>>                  
        -- Senator Amidala (Star Wars: Episode III)
>>
>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Dave Wootton wrote:
>>
>>
>> I will commit these to the branch. The affected plugins will be
 
>> org.eclipse.ptp.proxy, org.eclipse.ptp.rm.ibm.ll.proxy and  
>> org.eclipse.ptp.rm.ibm.pe.proxy. I'm waiting to complete the  
>> LoadLeveler changes, which I coded this morning and started to
 
>> test. I had some other things to do and probably won't get back
to  
>> this until Wednesday.
>> Dave
>> From:                
Randy Roberts <rsqrd@xxxxxxxx>
>> To:                 Parallel
Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date:                
04/12/2010 04:17 PM
>> Subject:                
Re: [ptp-dev] PE proxy changes for process model id to  
>> taskid change
>> Sent by:                
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Will these changes be committed to the branch?
>>
>> R^2
>> -- 
>> Randy M. Roberts
>> rsqrd@xxxxxxxx
>> work: (505)665-4285
>>
>> "If you are planning for a year,
>>      sow rice;
>> if you are planning for a decade,
>>      plant trees;
>> if you are planning for a lifetime,
>>      educate people"
>>                  
                  A Chinese
Proverb
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Dave Wootton wrote:
>>
>>
>> Randy, Greg
>>
>> I completed the changed to the PE proxy and ran some tests with
the  
>> new model implementation. These tests were successful. I need
to  
>> work on the LoadLeveler proxy which will take me a couple more
 
>> days, but I don't anticipate any problems there.
>>
>> I did notice a couple problems in the org.eclipse.ptp.launch plugin
 
>> that are unrelated to the model changes
>> 1) There were a couple errors in  
>> ParallelLaunchConfigurationDelegate where doCleanupLaunch and
 
>> doCompleteJobLaunch were declared as protected while the  
>> declarations they override were declared public.
>> 2)The getProgramArguments method in  
>> AbstractParallelLaunchConfigurationDelegate is trying to use an
 
>> org.eclipse.ptp.utils.core.linux.ArgumentParser class which doesn't
 
>> seem to exist.
>>
>> Dave_______________________________________________
>> ptp-dev mailing list
>> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> ptp-dev mailing list
>> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ptp-dev mailing list
>> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> ptp-dev mailing list
>> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ptp-dev mailing list
>> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> ptp-dev mailing list
>> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ptp-dev mailing list
>> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ptp-dev mailing list
>> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>

_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev

_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev


_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev