Re: [ptp-dev] time to branch for 2.1.1?

[Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

That was going to be my next question. I don't really know what constitutes "everything" anymore. There is a lot of dead stuff in the repo.

This is the list of what I have in my workspace... is this complete? TAU is notably absent I guess, as I've never tried to build it. Is everything in the TAU folder valid?

org.eclipse.ptp
/org.eclipse.ptp-feature
/org.eclipse.ptp.aix.ppc
org.eclipse.ptp.core
/org.eclipse.ptp.core-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.debug.core
/org.eclipse.ptp.debug.sdm
org.eclipse.ptp.debug.sdm.core
org.eclipse.ptp.debug.sdm.ui
org.eclipse.ptp.debug.ui
/org.eclipse.ptp.external-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.help
org.eclipse.ptp.launch
/org.eclipse.ptp.linux.ppc
/org.eclipse.ptp.linux.x86
/org.eclipse.ptp.linux.x86_64
/org.eclipse.ptp.macosx.ppc
/org.eclipse.ptp.macosx.x86
/org.eclipse.ptp.master
/org.eclipse.ptp.perf-feature
/org.eclipse.ptp.perf.tau-feature
/org.eclipse.ptp.perf.tau.fortran-feature
/org.eclipse.ptp.pldt-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.common
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.help
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.lapi
/org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.lapi-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.mpi.analysis
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.mpi.analysis.cdt
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.mpi.core
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.openmp.analysis
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.openmp.core
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.openmp.ui.pv
org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.wizards
/org.eclipse.ptp.proxy
org.eclipse.ptp.proxy.protocol
/org.eclipse.ptp.rdt-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.core
org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.core.remotejars
org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.core.stubs
org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.core.tests
/org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.doc.user
/org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.releng
org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.services
org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.services.test
org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.ui
/org.eclipse.ptp.releng
/org.eclipse.ptp.remote-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.remote.core
/org.eclipse.ptp.remote.remotetools-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.remote.remotetools.core
org.eclipse.ptp.remote.remotetools.ui
/org.eclipse.ptp.remote.rse-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.remote.rse.core
org.eclipse.ptp.remote.rse.ui
org.eclipse.ptp.remote.ui
/org.eclipse.ptp.remotetools-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.remotetools.core
org.eclipse.ptp.remotetools.environment.core
org.eclipse.ptp.remotetools.environment.generichost
org.eclipse.ptp.remotetools.environment.launcher
org.eclipse.ptp.remotetools.environment.ui
org.eclipse.ptp.remotetools.preferences
org.eclipse.ptp.remotetools.utils
org.eclipse.ptp.rm.remote
/org.eclipse.ptp.sdm-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.ui
/org.eclipse.ptp.utils
/org.eclipse.ptp.utils-feature
org.eclipse.ptp.utils.core
org.eclipse.ptp.utils.ui

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/26/2009 12:52 PM

Please respond to
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [ptp-dev] time to branch for 2.1.1?

Hi Chris,

I guess it is getting to the point where we need to branch. I'm fine  
with you doing it, just make sure that you get everything. The branch  
name would be ptp_2_1.

Cheers,

Greg


On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Chris Recoskie wrote:

> Hi everyone.
>
> I am thinking it is becoming time to branch the repository. We have  
> some new RDT features that are approaching completion that we will  
> want to put in for for the next major release (2.2 I assume), but  
> don't want to put into 2.1.1. Also, I want to soon start getting RDT  
> working against Eclipse 3.5 and CDT 6.0.
>
> Does anyone have a problem with me branching the repo? Do we have a  
> naming convention for branches already?
>
> ===========================
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
> IBM Toronto
>
> _______________________________________________
> ptp-dev mailing list
> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev

_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev