[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ptp-dev] PE resource manager
|
Greg
There is code in my proxy which tries to write the routing_file that might
be causing your problem. This was code I had in my original patch since I
wasn't sure who was going to create the routing file. I haven't been
seeing the problem since I get an error complaining about invalid
pathnames when I try to open the routing file. I don't know why this code
is just causing problems now, but I'll send a patch commenting that code
out for now.
We probably want to reconsider the GUI writing the routing file later,
since as we have a larger number of tasks, sending the task mapping data
across the network twice could be a paerformance problem.
Dave
Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/27/2008 07:12 PM
Please respond to
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [ptp-dev] PE resource manager
Also, there seems to be some regression in the PE RM after the last
build. When I try to debug an application, the routing_file just
contains "0" and the sdm crashes because of an invalid number of
processes. Any idea what may have happened?
Greg
On Oct 27, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
> Dave,
>
> It looks like the PE RM is treating the "debug" flag to indicate
> that debugging should be enabled in the RM (and in the SDM).
> Actually, this flag is meant to indicated the the job is a debug job
> (I know it's kind of redundant). Do you have a problem if I change
> this in the PE RM?
>
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> ptp-dev mailing list
> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
>
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
