Ah, now I see. I actually though you were referring to brainless getters and setters since this seems to be quite common in the Java world.
On 31 jan 2011, at 15:33, petru lincu wrote: I'm not referring to those brainless getters and setters that do nothing but expose the private member variables. What I would like to know is why isn't there any consistency check for e.g. negative heights and wights or a diposed widget or invalid thread access, etc.
--- On Sun, 1/30/11, Jacob <doobnet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Jacob <doobnet@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [platform-swt-dev] SWT Event class design To: "Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list." <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sunday, January 30, 2011, 2:55 AM
Yes, but that would be the case if you had setters as well. If you only have getters then I see your point.
/Jacob
Carlborg -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
_______________________________________________ platform-swt-dev mailing list platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
|