Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [platform-swt-dev] OSX SWT Compatibility


Thanks - fixed!



Re: [platform-swt-dev] OSX SWT Compatibility

Steve Joanou to: Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list.        
05/09/2009 01:34 AM

Sent by: platform-swt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Please respond to "Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list."        







Much thanks Carolyn.  Very concise. BTW, I noticed a cut-n-paste error.  The link is repeated just above the question.

Steve


2009/5/8 Carolyn MacLeod <Carolyn_MacLeod@xxxxxxxxxx>

I added an SWT FAQ:
http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#osxvms
Hope this helps,

Carolyn



Re: [platform-swt-dev] OSX SWT Compatibility


Steve Joanou to: Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list.        
05/08/2009 03:40 PM


Sent by: platform-swt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx


Please respond to "Eclipse Platform SWT component developers list."        









Thanks for your replies.  I have a Mac Mini x86 for testing apps with
Tiger and Java5. I think your response clears up my concerns.  I do
believe this info should go to the SWT Faq to minimize future question
churn. So to recap:

Tiger x86 - SWT Carbon only, no SWT Cocoa ;(
Tiger x86_64 - I do not believe this exists.  Can someone verify?
Leopard+ x86 - SWT Cocoa x86 or SWT Carbon
Leopard+ x86_64 - SWT Cocoa x64 preferred, x86 if running 32 bit JVM
or SWT Carbon if 1.5 is available.

Is this correct?


2009/5/8 Eugene Ostroukhov <
eostroukhov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I believe it is more based on VM version.
> I think, only Cocoa x86_64 is compatible with Java6 VM. Java5 VM can run
> both. I haven't tested older VMs. I'm on Leopard.
>
> Did they release Java5 on Tiger?
>
> On 8 Тра 2009, at 21:30, Steve Joanou wrote:
>
>> Now that SWT Cocoa is about to release, what is the compatibility with
>> OSX versions, JVMs, and architectures?
>>
>> I saw no clear documentation.  Below are my guesses, but I am unsure.
>> I am assuming that it is using a JRE1.5.  Could someone expand this to
>> cover all scenarios?  Even better, put it on the website - should I
>> write a bug against the site?
>>
>>                           Tigerx86 | Leopardx86 | Leopardx86_64
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Carbon                |      Y     |         Y          |           N
>>         |
>> Cocoa x86           |      N    |         Y           |         N
>>    |
>> Cocoa x86_64      |      N    |        N           |         Y
>> |
>>
>> Thanks and don't forget mother's day!
>> _______________________________________________
>> platform-swt-dev mailing list
>>
platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-swt-dev mailing list
>
platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
platform-swt-dev mailing list

platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev


_______________________________________________
platform-swt-dev mailing list

platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev

_______________________________________________
platform-swt-dev mailing list
platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev


Back to the top