[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [platform-swt-dev] [ANN] Eclipse SWT/Fox plugin available ( pre-alpha)
|
Okay, my apologies.
Yet, I posted the announcement at 10:16AM E.Europe LT and then complained at
7:56PM E.Europe LT.
That is an interval of 9+ hrs. Longer than a regular work day! :-)
/Ivan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Northover" <Steve_Northover@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <platform-swt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [platform-swt-dev] [ANN] Eclipse SWT/Fox plugin available (
pre-alpha)
>
> Ivan, we are maxed out. Nobody has had the time to look into it.
Besides,
> you posted at 10:11am and then complained about no reply at 12:51. <g>
>
>
>
> |---------+---------------------------------->
> | | "Ivan Markov" |
> | | <ivan.markov@xxxxxxxxx>|
> | | Sent by: |
> | | platform-swt-dev-admin@|
> | | eclipse.org |
> | | |
> | | |
> | | 06/09/2003 12:51 PM |
> | | Please respond to |
> | | platform-swt-dev |
> | | |
> |---------+---------------------------------->
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------|
> |
|
> | To: platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
> | cc:
|
> | Subject: Re: [platform-swt-dev] [ANN] Eclipse SWT/Fox plugin
available ( pre-alpha) |
> |
|
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I guess I may become boring by repeating about this SWT/Fox thing, yet I
> would really appreciate *any* comments on this from the OTI developers.
> I know you are not paid to try or to review or to comment on someone
else's
> code and that noone has asked me to do it.
> But isn't there a little bit of curiosity in you? It is so much related to
> your everyday work.
>
> Given that a new port is a huge effort and that SWT (and Eclipse) are
> supposedly open source, I find this silence here a little bit, err,
> hostile.
> Probably it's all some special kind of IBM/OTI-open source but I really
> don't get it.
>
> Regards,
> Ivan
>
> P.S. Sorry if I sound a bit harsh I didn't mean to. :-) Just to push you a
> bit, that's it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ivan Markov
> To: platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:11 AM
> Subject: [platform-swt-dev] [ANN] Eclipse SWT/Fox plugin available (
> pre-alpha)
>
> (This is posted in the newsgroup as well.)
> SWT/Fox reached a stage where it can (almost) run Eclipse.
>
> There are still *lots* of bugs, some of them are serious showstoppers
> (crashes, focusing problems, redraw problems) that will prevent one from
> running Eclipse for everyday work. I'll try to fix them ASAP.
>
> Nevertheless, I welcome everyone willing to try it out, to go to SWT/Fox
> home page, http://swtfox.sf.net .
>
> Note that there's a SWT/Fox Plugin Update Site as well, so updating
> Eclipse to use SWT/Fox shouldn't be a problem. Check the home page for
> more details.
>
> There are Fox/Win32 & Fox/Linux/x86 versions of the port uploaded.
> Note that the Fox/Win32 port is for testing purposes only.
>
> The real target of the port is Fox + *nix + X11.
>
> Since SWT/Fox is very unstable and not (yet) appropriate for daily work,
> please, make a backup of your workspace directory _and_ start with a
clean
> one before updating Eclipse with the plugin.
>
> I welcome any volunteer that wants to code/test/give suggestions etc.
> Probably the most useful thing would be if someone with access to 64b
Unix
> (Solaris/Sparc, anyone?) steps up and tries to carry out the build
> procedure on such machine.
>
> In theory SWT/Fox is 64b clean and it should run anywere Posix + X11 are
> available.
>
> P.S. Once you've installed SWT/Fox in Eclipse, you can activate it by
> runing Eclipse this way: 'eclipse -ws fox'
>
> P.S. Users of older Linux distributions (pre gcc 3.2) may encounter
> problems running SWT/Fox, because at the moment it is not statically
> linked with libc++. (I haven't succeeded yet in convincing Ant/CPPTasks
to
> link *some* libraries statically.)
>
> /Ivan
>
> P.S. Anyone interested?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-swt-dev mailing list
> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev
>