>I've been working on one, and got it partly working. Getting it to work
as a
>plugin has been challenging wrt classloaders. I chatted with some of
the
>Instantiations folks at JavaOne, and I think we came up with an idea
to make
>the classloaders work. I'll see if I can try it out this coming
weekend.
>>BTW: The OTI implementation for VA
Micro that keeps coming up really
>wouldn't work here. I've looked into it
and it's not complete (I believe it
>assumes J2ME personal config, which
is rather limited), and wasn't really a
>peer setup.
>>-- Scott
>>>
-----Original Message-----
>> From:
platform-swt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> [
mailto:platform-swt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Rodrigo Augusto
>> Barbato Ferreira
>> Sent:
Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:05 PM
>> To:
platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [platform-swt-dev] AWT on top
of SWT
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would
like to know if there is (or at least if it
>> is possible) to write an
alternate implementation of
>> the AWT on top of
SWT.
>>
>> Since SWT is VM independent it would yield a
VM
>> indepent AWT which is quite interesting for reuse
>> by
VM writers.
>>
>> TIA.
>>
>> Best
Regards,
>> Rodrigo.
>>
>> --
>> Rodrigo
Augusto Barbato Ferreira
>> {M|B}.S. Computer Science,
U{NICAMP|FMG}/BRAZIL
>> Visit the Jewel VM Project at
http://www.jewelvm.com/>>
_______________________________________________
>> platform-swt-dev
mailing list
>> platform-swt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-swt-dev