Re: [platform-releng-dev] Request for clarification on performance branc

[Sonia Dimitrov <Sonia_Dimitrov@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jerome,

we have not started using this branch,
however we can look into the possibility of renaming it to perf_31x as
you suggest.  More to come....

Sonia

Jerome Lanneluc <jerome_lanneluc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/06/2005 06:36 AM

Please respond to
"Eclipse platform release engineering list."

To	platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[platform-releng-dev] Request for clarification on performance        branches naming

After some investigation, I found out that branch
perf_31 for
org.eclipse.releng was used to run the performance tests for the 3.1
maintenance stream.
Note that for the 3.0 maintenance stream, branch perf_301 was used and
branch perf_30 was the base to compare against.

This leads to 2 questions:
- which branch is used to build the base for 3.1 ?
- why was the name perf_31 chosen for the 3.1 maintenance stream ? (I agree
that perf_301 was not a good name - especially when we were at version
3.0.2 - but I would have preferred perf_31maintenance, or better perf_31x).

Thanks for clarifying this,
Jerome

_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev