Hi,
Regarding the “lazy” keyword, in which context should we use it? The usage is quite heterogeneous in the .tpd files, I would like to understand better the case.
Regards,
Rémi
-------------------------------------------------------
Rémi SCHNEKENBURGER
+33 (0)1 69 08 48 48
CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV
Institut CARNOT CEA LIST
 www.eclipse.org/papyrus
De : papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
De la part de Philip Langer
Envoyé : mardi 8 novembre 2016 11:11
À : papyrus-rt developer discussions <papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Failing builds
Hi Céline,
thanks, your change -- i.e. regenerating the target -- fixes the build. But to ensure that this problem doesn't reoccur, I'd like to suggest to use the lazy keyword for all non-release update-sites (as mentioned earlier). I applied this
keyword in https://git.eclipse.org/r/84214 for EMF Compare / EGit integration update sites.
Also, I rebased change 84214, but it seems that unrelated tests are failing (org.eclipse.papyrusrt.umlrt.core.tests.creation.CreateElementTest).
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Ernesto Posse <eposse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Céline. By the way, are you Ok with merging change 84214?
Hi everyone,
The Master-Core build
is back to normal.
The regeneration of .target,
was the solution.
Regards
Céline
Objet :
Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Failing builds
Hi Peter,
Céline is currently investigating the patch proposed for these regressions.
Regards,
Rémi
-------------------------------------------------------
Rémi SCHNEKENBURGER
+33 (0)1 69 08 48 48
CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV
Institut CARNOT CEA LIST
www.eclipse.org/papyrus
De :
papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
De la part de Peter Cigéhn
Envoyé : lundi 7 novembre 2016 15:06
À : papyrus-rt developer discussions <papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : [papyrus-rt-dev] Failing builds
When looking into the logs, this looks related to the discussion about the changing to use the integration repo of the custom builds of EGit and EMF
Compare, which I guess is what is proposed in https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/84214/
Could someone who knows more about the builds and why they are failing look into this, and if possible merge in the proposed Gerrit change (if that
is concluded what should fix the failing builds).
_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev
_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev
--
Dr. Philip Langer
Senior Software Architect / General Manager
EclipseSource Services GmbH
|
