Hi,
I have not looked at the latest patch set yet, I just wanted to give a quick comment, since I saw that you wanted to get the model added to the Oomph catalogue (which I think will be great).
As part of
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/69746/ Celine proposed to rename the project in which this setup-file is placed. Celine's argument was that it needed to follow naming rules which disallows '-' to be included in the project name. I made the comment that any change to the project name, will impact the installation instructions, including any users that already have followed these instructions and now have a reference to the setup file via a plain git resource link as given by the instructions at
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Papyrus-RT/User_Guide/Eclipse_Installer
Since I do know that the Oomph catalogue uses exactly the same approach using a plain git resource link, we will "bump into" yet another issue if we later decide to change the name of the project containing these setup-files, then with both the product setup files as well as the new project setup files.
So I would really like to settle the name of this project. I do know that Celine reverted the name of the project in later patch sets of that Gerrit change, but I guess Celine still thinks that the project should align its names. As I indicated in that Gerrit change, I think that Charles should give his view on any name change, since it will impact the installation guide (which Charles has mainly worked with) and the aspect on the impact on any existing users that now has references to a file in this project in the Git repo.
Simplest would of course be if we just accepted that this project keep its name which does not follow the naming conventions. But I don't know what kind of impact that will have.... Celine, please give your view regarding this.
/Peter Cigéhn
