Hi, Ernesto,
It sounds like we’re close to finishing this. I am set up for Neon, so if there’s nothing very unusual about this generated code, I’m happy to give it a try. I would prefer not to disable any more tests than the RCPTT (which problem is not unique to the Neon branch, it seems).
But, this begs the question of why the generated code should be different now? It shouldn’t matter that the platform is now Neon-based; the code generation logic wouldn’t change, especially because the target language (C++) and model libraries wouldn’t have changed.
On 5 April, 2016 at 13:46:06, Ernesto Posse (eposse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
On second thought, the TEST_MODEL parameter only
controls the post-maven test.
I can regenerate the test and copy the sources to the
expected_src dir, but I need to update my IDE first (I'm not on
Neon yet).
_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev
|
