Re: [osgi-wg] working group membership and tck questions

["Daniel Bandera" <bandera@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The current plan is to make the OSGi WG TCKs available as open source with branding restrictions similar to those for Eclipse Jakarta EE.
See: https://jakarta.ee/legal/trademark_guidelines/

Best regards,
Dan

Dan Bandera
(512) 286-5228
Program Director, Blockchain, Istio, Java technologies, Node.js
IBM Open Technologies, Austin, Texas
The OSGi Alliance ( osgi.org ) President and Board of Directors



"Christoph Läubrich" ---2020/11/11 01:41:58 AM--- > 2) TCK access: That's a really good question. Restricted TCK access has always been a

From: "Christoph Läubrich" <laeubi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: osgi-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 2020/11/11 01:41 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [osgi-wg] working group membership and tck questions
Sent by: osgi-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

 > 2) TCK access:

That's a really good question. Restricted TCK access has always been a 
high barrier for smaller open-source projects to test their projects for 
conformance!


Am 10.11.20 um 23:56 schrieb Scott Lewis:
> Howdy,
> 
> Two questions:
> 
> 1) In the osgi working group proposal, it says this about Committer Members
> 
> 
>         Committer members
> 
> Committer Members are individuals who through a process of meritocracy 
> defined by the Eclipse Foundation Development Process are able to 
> contribute and commit materials to the Eclipse Foundation projects 
> included in the scope of this working group. Committers may be members 
> by virtue of working for a member organization, or may choose to 
> complete the membership process independently if they are not. For 
> further explanation and details, see the Eclipse Foundation Committer 
> Membership 
> <https://www.eclipse.org/membership/become_a_member/committer.php> page.
> 
> For those committers that are not working for a member organization it 
> says they 'may choose to complete the membership process 
> independently'.  The next sentence link implies that the 'membership 
> process' being referred to is the committer membership process.  Does 
> that mean the only requirement for independent committer members to the 
> working group is just regular committer membership? (i.e. signing 
> membership agreement, etc)?   Or is there additional process and 
> agreements for osgi working group membership for independent committers?
> 
> 2) TCK access:   As I remember, the OSGi Alliance restricted access to 
> the various TCKs by membership level.   How is TCK access going to work 
> wrt the osgi wg?   Specifically...for projects that implement 
> specifications (e.g. Equinox-framework, ECF-remote services admin, others)?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osgi-wg mailing list
> osgi-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-wg
> 
_______________________________________________
osgi-wg mailing list
osgi-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-wg