For the Specification Committee? I thought we were able to end the meeting early yesterday?
--
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781
OSGi Fellow and OSGi Specification Project lead // mobile: +1 386 848 3788
hargrave@xxxxxxxxxx
----- Original message -----
From: "Jürgen Albert" <j.albert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: "osgi-wg-specification-committee" <osgi-wg-specification-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: OSGI WG Specification Committee <osgi-wg-specification-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [osgi-wg-specification-committee] Extend Committee Meetings
Date: Thu, Feb 4, 2021 11:08
Hi Folks,
at the end of this and our last Meeting I've gotten the strong feeling
that it might be a good Idea to make the meetings longer. I know that
most of our schedules are tight, but I believe it to be necessary.
Right now we have a lot of ground to cover and a bunch of things need
discussion and explanation. Things might roll easier in the future, when
we get some more practice, but right now we spend the first 15 minutes
to find ourself. If a productive discussion starts, we have to cut it,
in order to make any headway with our agenda.
So for the time being, I would suggest to add at least another 30 minutes.
How do you feel about this?
Jürgen.
--
Jürgen Albert
Geschäftsführer
Data In Motion Consulting GmbH
Kahlaische Str. 4
07745 Jena
Mobil: 0157-72521634
E-Mail: j.albert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.datainmotion.de
XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Juergen_Albert5
Rechtliches
Jena HBR 513025
_______________________________________________
osgi-wg-specification-committee mailing list
osgi-wg-specification-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-wg-specification-committee
