RE: [orbit-dev] Bugfixing 3rd party code due to lack of a release?

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I know this isn't exactly what you meant
... but, becareful what you put in writing .... 
anything who's purpose is "....
work around any IP
issues ..." would not be the right thing to do, by 
definition. But, I know you meant, "one idea
that would 
follow the Eclipse legal process" :)

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/12/2007 08:43 AM

Please respond to
Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Orbit Developer discussion" <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Janet Campbell" <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bjorn Freeman-Benson" <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [orbit-dev] Bugfixing 3rd party code due to lack of a release?

Actually,

here is an idea that might work around any IP
issues: I could probably ask the original 
author of the two patches to attach them on
our Eclipse Bugzilla bug and license them under
EPL. 

Then we should be out of trouble if I applied
them to the released commons net source, 
shouldn't we?

For Reference due diligence for commons net
has been done via
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm 
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev