Re: [orbit-dev] Ready to Contribute LPG 1.0

[Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Christian, 

This is not a hard and fast thing by
any means.  Basically as a point of manageability, it would be better
to not have a committer per library :-)  Some projects, especially
ones that have a large number of bundles, will have more committers, some
will have a small number (perhaps even none if they can convince someone
else to do the work).   The observation is that by calling out who
from a given area (project, subproject) has the skills, knowledge and commit
rights to work in Orbit, we increase the efficiency and effectiveness of
the shared approach.  So to that extent, the PMC that needs to approve
third party code use in your part of the world should know about you and
your involvement with Orbit so that that involvement can be used to its
full extent.

Make sense?
Jeff

Christian Damus/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/22/2006 02:11 PM

Please respond to
Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [orbit-dev] Ready to Contribute LPG 1.0

Hi, Jeff, 

EMFT is dissolving, its components moving to various places in the Eclipse
Modeling Project.  I am representing OCL, which is in the MDT project,
so I'll be happy to be MDT's Orbit representative.

Are we looking for a small number of committers from each *top-level* project
(e.g., Eclipse, Modeling, Tools, Technology, ...) or from projects (e.g,
Platform, GMF, MDT, Mylar)? 

If the scope is to be the top-level project, then perhaps my project's
(Modeling) PMC needs to be involved in deciding who will represent it?

Cheers, 

Christian

---

Christian W. Damus
Component Lead, MDT
UML2 OCL and EMFT-QTV
IBM
Rational Software

Jeff McAffer/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/22/06 01:58 PM

Please respond to
Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	Re: [orbit-dev] Ready to Contribute LPG 1.0

Hey Christian, 

This looks good.  I'll put in the request. 

As a point of interest, I think you are the first Orbit committer from
EMFT right?  Since we are trying to keep the Orbit committership down,
are you willing to act as the library bundling guy for EMFT?

Jeff

Christian Damus/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/22/2006 10:50 AM

Please respond to
Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[orbit-dev] Ready to Contribute LPG 1.0

Hi, all, 

I am ready to contribute version 1.0 of the LPG Java Runtime library from
the LALR Parser Generator (LPG) project at SourceForge.

Details are available at 

  https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165459

but, in short: 

- the proposed bundle symbolic name is net.sourceforge.lpg.lpgjavaruntime
  (the one and only package in the library is named lpg.lpgjavaruntime)
- the library is licensed under EPL 1.0 
- this library was initially approved for use by the EMFT OCL project in
its 
  1.0 version.  This project is now re-branded as MDT UML2 OCL
under 
  the Eclipse Modeling Project 

All I need to proceed is committer access. 

Thanks, 

Christian

---

Christian W. Damus
Component Lead, MDT
UML2 OCL and EMFT-QTV
IBM
Rational Software_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev