Cool. Makes sense.
Scott
Jeff McAffer wrote:
ALL 3rd party libs approved by the
Foundation
are automatically accepted for inclusion in Orbit. In fact, you will
get harsh release review questions if your approved 3rd party libs are
NOT included in Orbit. The Orbit team/community is not in a position
to make a judgement call. Of course, like any open source project,
if no one is interested in doing the work, it doesn't get done. But,
since
you went through the trouble of getting the approval, you likely want
to
bundle it. In general the hope is that Orbit will include a reasonable
set of infrastructure and best practices that it would be attractive
for
you to become a committer in Orbit and do the bundling work there.
Jeff
Hi Jeff,
Jeff McAffer wrote:
Hey Scott,
The interesting thing is to understand what things you (potential
committers
in general) would work on. Eclipse projects that have approval to
use some third party libs should also look to have these libs bundled
in
Orbit. The libs may already be a bundled or you may need to
"contribute"
bundled versions. In the former case you are done and there is no
particular need to take on the responsibilities of being an Orbit
committer.
In the latter case you can decide to contribute and maintain the
bundled version (and future versions) of the libs you need. In that
way it is akin to how it works on other projects: you are coming
with an initial contribution and committing to nurturing and
maintaining
it.
Look at it this way, if you are already setting up and maintaining
bundled
versions of third party libs in your project then you are a prime
candidate
for being an Orbit committer and doing that work in Orbit where it can
be easily discovered and shared.
I see. Yeah actually I was thinking
1) Suggest moving the Jive Smack Libs to Orbit under ECF (once they
have
the providermanager made extensible...I've been working with Matt
Tucker
on this)
2) I'm thinking that the Maven 'embedded' (Maven runtime API) could
also
eventually go under Orbit (associated with the heretofore project
called
'CITP'...probably moving to be called 'Kepler') as a plugin/set of
plugins.
So I guess I wouldn't need separate approval to contribute either/both
of these to Orbit as long as people come to agreement about
contribution
appropriateness for Orbit (and all legal checks passed, etc)?
Scott
Make sense?
Jeff
This is Scott Lewis, committer and project lead for the Eclipse
Communication Framework. http://www.eclipse.org/ecf.
I'm interested in becoming an Orbit committer. Would this be possible?
What should I do to make it so (assuming this is OK with existing
committers, of course).
Thanksinadvance,
Scott
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
|
