| Re: [openmq-dev] Release tracking for OpenMQ |
Piotr, I'm pleased to nominate you for committer to Open MQ. I'll kick off the election now. -- Ed On 10/8/2020 1:35 AM, Piotr Żygieło wrote:
I notice there is no Release set up for Open MQ. I believe that a new release record should be created, in preparation to support the forthcoming Jakarta EE 9 release.Related: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/lists/openmq-dev/msg00047.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!MPvYtLYOZdY4oCEquMlqIGuhfHCH6tc14bvbF_8XJ2CWWXQiKuK8Dz9dPGS-RsY$Any comments?I still have some questions unanswered regarding the final release, mainly regarding references to Oracle and no EF. For example - https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/openmq/issues/535*issue-655180341__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!MPvYtLYOZdY4oCEquMlqIGuhfHCH6tc14bvbF_8XJ2CWWXQiKuK8Dz9dCbR7SVA$ - mentions only Oracle copyright and no EF. Is that what EF wants in the final product? - https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/openmq/issues/533__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!MPvYtLYOZdY4oCEquMlqIGuhfHCH6tc14bvbF_8XJ2CWWXQiKuK8Dz9dVXxHJgI$ - https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/openmq/search?l=Java&q=*22Oracle*GlassFish*28tm*29*Server*MQ**A22__;JSslJSsrKyU!!GqivPVa7Brio!MPvYtLYOZdY4oCEquMlqIGuhfHCH6tc14bvbF_8XJ2CWWXQiKuK8Dz9dCTEwVRk$ - Javadocs bundled in zip also use "Oracle GlassFish(tm) Server" It might be ok, I don't know.