| Re: [omr-dev] our coding standard |
Of the group presented, my preference would be chromium. But I can very clearly see that webkit is much closer to our current style than any of the others. Luc omr-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 2016-08-30 20:29:37: > From: Matthew Gaudet <magaudet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: omr developer discussions <omr-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 2016-08-30 20:29 > Subject: Re: [omr-dev] our coding standard > Sent by: omr-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Has anyone had a chance to review the auto formatted versions > > of OMR that Matthew thoughtfully put together for us? For your > > convenience: > > > > * LLVM https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-llvm > > * Webkit https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-webkit > > * Mozilla https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-mozilla > > * Chromium https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-chromium > > * Google https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-google > > > > I would like to decide by the end of the week, if possible. My vote is > > for LLVM. > > > > What do you think? > > It was just pointed out to me, that despite the branch names, I > accidentally pushed some duplicate branches: Chromium and Google were > not correctly done due to human error. > > *whoops*. > > That's now been rectified. > > > _______________________________________________ > omr-dev mailing list > omr-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or > unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/omr-dev >