[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [nebula-dev] Re: [New Widget] AeroToolbar
|
Sorry once more for the delay but EclipseCon kept me away from so many
things. I'll file the CQ in a minute.
Nebula-Devs please visit the portal and cast your vote.
Tom
Am 11.03.10 21:39, schrieb Tom Schindl:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> I sorry but I'm the one to blame that we didn't made progress but
> EclipsCon preperation is take in all my time.
>
> Anyways Nebula-Committers: It's up to you. I think AeroToolbar is a cool
> widget and I'd like to get it in. Any other thoughts on this, else I'll
> start the Committer Nomination Sunday 12:00 CET please check your portal
> page to vote Lukasz in, else please speak up here before (or privately
> to tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
>
> Tom
>
> Am 11.03.10 21:29, schrieb Łukasz Milewski:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Any news regarding review of AeroToolbar widget?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lukasz Milewski
>>
>> 2010/2/11 Łukasz Milewski <lukasz.milewski@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:lukasz.milewski@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>> Thanks. Modified and uploaded to the bug report.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lukasz Milewski
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 23:29, Tom Schindl <listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> /*******************************************************************************
>> > * Copyright (c) 2010, Łukasz Milewski and others.
>> > * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying
>> materials
>> > * are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public
>> License v1.0
>> > * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
>> > * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
>> > *
>> > * Contributors:
>> > * Lukasz Milewski <lukasz.milewski@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:lukasz.milewski@xxxxxxxxx>> - Initial API and implementation
>> >
>> *******************************************************************************/
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Am 11.02.10 23:24, schrieb Łukasz Milewski:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > Updated version without JNA is attached to bug report.
>> > Please advise on copyright note.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Lukasz Milewski
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 22:40, Tom Schindl
>> <listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Lukasz,
>> >
>> > I think you won't get it into GC probably because GC is a
>> cross platform
>> > class whereas OS is not.
>> >
>> > Anyways I'd really love to get your code in. If you could
>> remove the JNA
>> > dependency for the initial contribution this would be great.
>> >
>> > What do other Nebula-Dev think about this control?
>> >
>> > Tom
>> >
>> > Am 11.02.10 22:31, schrieb Łukasz Milewski:
>> > > Hi Tom,
>> > >
>> > > At the moment JNA is required, I can easily remove that
>> dependency by
>> > > drawing text without shadow. It's not required for
>> initial approval.
>> > > I see a nice solution, I will remove drawing shadow from
>> the code and
>> > > will submit enchancement to SWT to include
>> DrawShadowText in win32 OS
>> > > class (or better method in GC).
>> > >
>> > > Will try to do this as soon as possible as time will allow.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Lukasz Milewski
>> > > Sorry for typos, send from moble
>> > >
>> > >> On 11 Feb 2010 22:11, "Tom Schindl"
>> <listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>> > >> <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi Lukasz,
>> > >>
>> > >> One more note on this I'll also add it to bug report.
>> We need to
>> > get rid
>> > >> of the JNA-Dependency because we are not allowed have a
>> LPGPL
>> > library as
>> > >> a prerequisit only as a works with but it looks like
>> this widget is
>> > >> useless with having access to it.
>> > >>
>> > >> So think we have 2 options:
>> > >> a) Get help from SWT with Win32-only-SPI
>> > >> b) Write our own JNI-Bride for the stuff you need
>> > >>
>> > >> On the one hand side I'd prefer a) because then it
>> would work
>> > with pre
>> > >> 3.6.0 but on the other hand we need to write an
>> (maintain) the
>> > wrapper
>> > >> for win32 and win64 (though this probably not a big
>> task because
>> > we need
>> > >> to compile/build the stuff once, check it into CVS and
>> are done)
>> > >>
>> > >> Tom
>> > >>
>> > >> Am 11.02.10 21:43, schrieb Tom Schindl:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Hi Lukasz,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Just talked with one of the SWT-Committers and he said we
>> > should file a
>> > >> > bug and ...
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > nebula-dev mailing list
>> > > nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > nebula-dev mailing list
>> > nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > nebula-dev mailing list
>> > nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nebula-dev mailing list
>> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nebula-dev mailing list
>> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> nebula-dev mailing list
> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
