[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [nebula-dev] Re: nebula-dev Digest, Vol 9, Issue 17
|
I'm on board with this. I forgot
that the src can be imported into Eclipse for debugging and such.
Roland Tepp <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: nebula-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
12/21/2006 11:24 AM
Please respond to
Nebula Dev <nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| Nebula Dev <nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: [nebula-dev] Re: nebula-dev Digest,
Vol 9, Issue 17 |
|
I think source *should* be included. I find the source
to be the greatest documentation ever, if I've ever needed to debug, what's
going on under the hood of a widget, then having source for debugging is
priceless..
You should probably however consider packaging those the same way the rest
of eclipse does it - with both help and source as separate plug-ins/packages.
This way I could just stick those into my target platform and be done with
them, having the benefit of javadoc and source automatically available
to my ide.
Distribution could then be organized in both, plain old zip files and as
an update site.
For me, as a developer and nebula widget user, this would be the ideal
distribution model and it would closely resemble the way other projects
within eclipse do this.
Christopher J Gross kirjutas mulle midagi seesugust:
I don't have a problem with this. I don't think we should worry about
including a src.zip but I'm board with snippets and javadoc. Most
people don't care about the source. Re javadoc, ideally I'd like
to include a help plugin that added the javadoc to the main Eclipse help.
--
Roland Tepp
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
Attachment:
roland.vcf
Description: Binary data