| Re: [modeling-pmc] Works-with dependency for CQ 4861 |
|
Miles, Yes, I don't see the real problem either, but t's need to be crossed. :-P I'll ask Eike to explain the details. We'd like, in the future, to avoid having a long discussion about all the variations of back-end integration that CDO could support and would like to support. It really only needs to support one EPL-compatible version such that all the rest are merely work-with dependencies. Cheers, Ed Miles Parker wrote: Looks good to me, Ed. :) But then I can't see what the problem would be in the first place. (Is it the case that CDO needs an OODB and the DB40 is the only provider? Otherwise how is this any different then day DTP shipping multiple drivers for MySQL, Progress, Oracle...?) On Mar 2, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Ed Merks wrote:Hi, I approved https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4861 based on the discussion in this thread http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/emf-dev/msg01258.html but the IP team wants it discussed by the PMC. Does anyone have concerns that need further discussion? Regards, Ed _______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc_______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc |