Anthony,
I'll happily include you as a committer without a track record, though
the word "delegate" has me a bit concerned. I expect SAP and itemis
will propose specific names as well and hopefully will be in a position
to provide full leadership. Hopefully some others will step forward
too, but if not, so be it.
Cheers,
Ed
Anthony Hunter wrote:
Hi Ed, I completely agree with you here. And this was what I
thought we discussed on the call yesterday.
When IBM started these modeling components at Eclipse, one of the goals
was absolutely to build a community. This is a perfect opportunity, in
the absence of an army of existing committers to take over.
All I desire is one IBM committer on these projects, and I am that IBM
delegate today. IBM is fully committed to these components, so all we
are asking for is one committer.
Believe me, none of the components IBM requires for their commercial
product will be left with one committer again :-)
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613
 Ed Merks
---03/18/2009 10:57:48 AM---Guys, I thought I was very clear at
yesterday's PMC meeting that I personally
Guys,
I thought I was very clear at yesterday's PMC meeting that I personally
will decide the lists of committers for these three components based on
input and volunteers from the community. While OCL seems to be a
popular technology in which to get directly involved, the EMF QTV
components do not appear to be generating the same long list of
volunteers. So I will reboot these three components with interested
parties, regardless of their prior level of involvement. If we end up
with a long list of proven contributors, as is the case for OCL, only
then I will consider filtering down the selection. I won't leave these
components with just a single committer. Involvement from a diverse
group of committers is key to avoiding the problem that we're faced
with today.
Regards,
Ed
Anthony Hunter wrote:
Hi Bernd,
As you have seen from the controversy over MDL OCL and the precedents
set, SAP cannot become commiteers nor lead the EMF Query and
Transaction projects. SAP has not demonstrated activity in these
components in the last year.
Ed Merks and Christian are going to have to go through the IP logs and
tell us who has been activity contributing to Query, Transaction and
Validation over the last year.
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613
 Bernd Kolb
---03/18/2009 10:22:36 AM---Hi all, SAP is willing to staff and lead
the EMF Query and Transaction.
Hi all,
SAP is willing to staff and lead the EMF Query and Transaction.
However there is one little thing missing from our side: Final upper
management approval. We have an informal commitment. The official one
is supposed to be available in early April.
>From our side I would, at least initially, take the lead. For query
we would add 3 more committers. For transactions 2 in addition.
At the moment we are internally rewriting the query. This will also
use the proposed index.
For transactions the plan is to keep the project alive and in
maintenance with some additional features.
Best regards,
Bernd
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
|
